ZSNES board Forum Index ZSNES board
ZSNES and other SNES related stuff
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

will there be 64-bit support for zsnes 2?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ZSNES board Forum Index -> Bug Reports/Feature Requests
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
monkey_man
New Member


Joined: 01 Oct 2009
Posts: 1
Location: kuala lumpur

PostPosted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 4:39 am    Post subject: will there be 64-bit support for zsnes 2? Reply with quote

at present, i am unable to play many games because my system is 64-bits. Crying or Very sad

will there be 64-bit support in the future? Or emulators aren't bothered with 64-bits...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
snkcube
Hero of Time


Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 3997
Location: In front of the monitor

PostPosted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 4:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ZSNES runs fine under 64 bit OSs. There really is no need for ZSNES to be 64 bit.
_________________
Try out CCleaner
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Deathlike2
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer


Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 6882

PostPosted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 5:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In the future, probably.

However, if you're running 64-bit, it's more than enough for ZSNES.
_________________
Continuing FF4 Research...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
byuu
bsnes Developer
bsnes Developer


Joined: 12 Oct 2004
Posts: 2487

PostPosted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 2:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

snkcube wrote:
ZSNES runs fine under 64 bit OSs. There really is no need for ZSNES to be 64 bit.


Under Windows and OS X this is absolutely true, it makes no difference. But under Linux it's a bit of an issue. Distros like Ubuntu don't ship with 32-bit run-time libraries by default.

When I tried running 32-bit Firefox I had to apt-get about two dozen 32-bit libraries (just ia32-libs was not enough), and I never did get it all working well. It couldn't use my GTK+ theme info, couldn't go online, spit thousands of errors on the command line ... a real mess.

Duplicate all that and your entire compiler, headers, libraries, etc if you want to build something.

Plus I don't like the idea of having all that for one application. That said, I used to like running ZSNES in DOSBox for the nice debugger, but I may have been using a 32-bit distro at the time. If DOSBox has a 64-bit build, that would work.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
grinvader
ZSNES Shake Shake Prinny


Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 16777215
Location: PAL50, dood !

PostPosted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 5:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Deathlike2 wrote:
In the future, probably.

That's a mighty bold statement right there.

Much closer to lottery-winning-probably than my-foot-kicking-a-cat-probably.
_________________
皆黙って俺について来い!!
Code:
<grinvader> static const struct { const char *const name; void *const ptr; } const lbl24[]

Pantheon: Gideon Zhi | CaitSith2 | Nach
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Deathlike2
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer


Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 6882

PostPosted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 7:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

grinvader wrote:
Deathlike2 wrote:
In the future, probably.

That's a mighty bold statement right there.

Much closer to lottery-winning-probably than my-foot-kicking-a-cat-probably.


Find a cat lady. Then, it's a sure bet. Very Happy
_________________
Continuing FF4 Research...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cyrus
Inmate


Joined: 31 May 2005
Posts: 1502
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 2:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

grinvader wrote:
Deathlike2 wrote:
In the future, probably.

That's a mighty bold statement right there.

Much closer to lottery-winning-probably than my-foot-kicking-a-cat-probably.

Rumour has it that Windows 8 will be creeping by sometime around 2012 and may be a 128 bit OS and if not Windows 9 will be. Moving past a 32 bit version may be closer than you think.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dfreer
Hazed


Joined: 11 May 2007
Posts: 72

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cyrus wrote:
grinvader wrote:
Deathlike2 wrote:
In the future, probably.

That's a mighty bold statement right there.

Much closer to lottery-winning-probably than my-foot-kicking-a-cat-probably.

Rumour has it that Windows 8 will be creeping by sometime around 2012 and may be a 128 bit OS and if not Windows 9 will be. Moving past a 32 bit version may be closer than you think.


128-bit is not going to happen by 2012, from what I understand of it it won't even be practical for a long time yet. I doubt it will even happen in windows 9.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
adventure_of_link
Locksmith of Hyrule


Joined: 08 Aug 2004
Posts: 5613
Location: 255.255.255.255

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

dfreer wrote:
Cyrus wrote:
grinvader wrote:
Deathlike2 wrote:
In the future, probably.

That's a mighty bold statement right there.

Much closer to lottery-winning-probably than my-foot-kicking-a-cat-probably.

Rumour has it that Windows 8 will be creeping by sometime around 2012 and may be a 128 bit OS and if not Windows 9 will be. Moving past a 32 bit version may be closer than you think.


128-bit is not going to happen by 2012, from what I understand of it it won't even be practical for a long time yet. I doubt it will even happen in windows 9.

agreed. Hell it was hard enough transitioning from 32 bits to 64.

Also HOW long has 32 bits been out for?
_________________

<Nach> so why don't the two of you get your own room and leave us alone with this stupidity of yours?
NSRT here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
grinvader
ZSNES Shake Shake Prinny


Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 16777215
Location: PAL50, dood !

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 6:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cyrus wrote:
grinvader wrote:
Deathlike2 wrote:
In the future, probably.

That's a mighty bold statement right there.

Much closer to lottery-winning-probably than my-foot-kicking-a-cat-probably.

Rumour has it that Windows 8 will be creeping by sometime around 2012 and may be a 128 bit OS and if not Windows 9 will be. Moving past a 32 bit version may be closer than you think.

We totally care about windows versions to recode ten-thousands of lines of code.

Oh wait, not.
Because every processor and its mother will have enough virtualisation layers to run 32bits binaries with the correct setup (@byuu: fuck Ubuntu, they don't ship with anything by default).

adventure_of_link wrote:
Also HOW long has 32 bits been out for?

Only 24 years now.
_________________
皆黙って俺について来い!!
Code:
<grinvader> static const struct { const char *const name; void *const ptr; } const lbl24[]

Pantheon: Gideon Zhi | CaitSith2 | Nach
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
adventure_of_link
Locksmith of Hyrule


Joined: 08 Aug 2004
Posts: 5613
Location: 255.255.255.255

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 8:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

grinvader wrote:
adventure_of_link wrote:
Also HOW long has 32 bits been out for?

Only 24 years now.

yeah that's what I thought. So yeah, I don't think we're gonna be seeing 128 bits for awhile. Better enjoy 64 bits while you can cuz they're not going away anytime soon.
_________________

<Nach> so why don't the two of you get your own room and leave us alone with this stupidity of yours?
NSRT here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Nightcrawler
Romhacking God


Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 1937

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 12:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The only thing that is really moving the 64-bit transition now is increased addressing for more memory and peripherals. If 32-bit were still sufficient for this, 64-bit still wouldn't be catching on. I imagine much of the same will occur. We will have to start utilizing all 64-bit can offer us and start exceeding it's capacity before there is any serious movement to 128 bit.

AMD64 has been out for how many years now and went nowhere fast (as far as 64-bit is concerned)?

We are seeing diminishing returns for each generation increase, much like we do for consoles. 8-bit to 16-bit was huge. 16-bit to 32-bit was big, but not quite the leap 16-bit was. Now we're going 64-bit. Less of an impact than 32-bit. I imagine when we finally hit 128-bit, it will be about the same or slightly less.
_________________
TransCorp - Home of the Dual Orb 2, Cho Mahou Tairyku Wozz, and Emerald Dragon SFC/SNES translations.
ROMhacking.net - The central hub of the ROM hacking community.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
franpa
Gecko snack


Joined: 21 Aug 2005
Posts: 2176
Location: Australia, Brisbane

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 12:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nightcrawler wrote:
The only thing that is really moving the 64-bit transition now is increased addressing for more memory and peripherals.
I would think the fact it is included with all purchases of Windows 7 and is available for more editions of Windows 7 are the reason.
_________________
Core2 DUO e6750 @ 2.66GHZ, ASUS P5KC mb, 2 gig DDR2 800 RAM, 500g SATA2 HDD, X-FI Extreme Music, Nvidia Geforce 8800gt 512MB PCI-E, Windows Windows 7 RTM x64, Thermaltake 750watt Toughpower Power Supply, Thermaltake Armor+ MX case.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
KingMike
Rookie


Joined: 02 Jun 2008
Posts: 36

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

grinvader wrote:

adventure_of_link wrote:
Also HOW long has 32 bits been out for?

Only 24 years now.


But how long before 32-bit programming was actually commonplace?
I remember it not being pushed much until Win95.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
creaothceann
Seen it all


Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2841
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There were quite a few games using protected mode (via DOS4/G and other DOS extenders).
_________________
vSNES
MKV to AVI
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
odditude
Official tech support dood


Joined: 25 Jan 2006
Posts: 1090

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

KingMike wrote:
grinvader wrote:

adventure_of_link wrote:
Also HOW long has 32 bits been out for?

Only 24 years now.


But how long before 32-bit programming was actually commonplace?
I remember it not being pushed much until Win95.

nt 3.1, the only os you'd want to use on your brand spankin' new pentium pro box!

and +1 for dos/4gw and cwsdpmi all over the place in the early early '90s
_________________
Why yes, my shift key *IS* broken.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Squall_Leonhart
Regular


Joined: 10 Jun 2008
Posts: 323
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Under Windows and OS X this is absolutely true, it makes no difference. But under Linux it's a bit of an issue. Distros like Ubuntu don't ship with 32-bit run-time libraries by default.


I consider that to be a problem for the sadists and masochists that run Linux, rather then for the zsnes developers to overcome.
_________________

VBA-M Forum, NGOHQ
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
byuu
bsnes Developer
bsnes Developer


Joined: 12 Oct 2004
Posts: 2487

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 6:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Virtualization would solve the issue of compatibility, but non-native execution (eg dynarec) would just tack on yet another layer of latency. It's actually somewhat noticeable when I ran ZSNES in DOSbox for the debugger. Or when I run Super Game Boy games.

grinvader wrote:
(@byuu: fuck Ubuntu, they don't ship with anything by default).


Except PulseAudio :(
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
grinvader
ZSNES Shake Shake Prinny


Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 16777215
Location: PAL50, dood !

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 6:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ok, "anything fine".
_________________
皆黙って俺について来い!!
Code:
<grinvader> static const struct { const char *const name; void *const ptr; } const lbl24[]

Pantheon: Gideon Zhi | CaitSith2 | Nach
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
badinsults
"Your thread will be crushed."


Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 1438
Location: Not in Winnipeg

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I really see no benefit of moving to 128 bit processors, unless you are doing heavy duty math that requires ultra high precision. And even then, most scientists use FORTRAN 77 still, which only has 64 bit math as a non-standard extension by IBM. Really, going beyond 64 bit is unnecessary for all by the most niche things (video games may be one of those, but regular computer applications that most people have are not one of them).
_________________
<pagefault> i'd break up with my wife if she said FF8 was awesome
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
grinvader
ZSNES Shake Shake Prinny


Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 16777215
Location: PAL50, dood !

PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 7:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

There's also the fact that it's relatively easy to implement daisy-chains operations to get pseudo-huge size variables for extra precision thing at a mild cpu time cost - which is cheaper and cheaper with each generation.
_________________
皆黙って俺について来い!!
Code:
<grinvader> static const struct { const char *const name; void *const ptr; } const lbl24[]

Pantheon: Gideon Zhi | CaitSith2 | Nach
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Neo Kaiser
Inmate


Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 1532

PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 4:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I remember Pagefault releasing a prototype of a 64 bit version of ZSNES. I didn't download it...I regret it.
_________________
Yes I know that my grammar sucks!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nightcrawler
Romhacking God


Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 1937

PostPosted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 12:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

franpa wrote:
Nightcrawler wrote:
The only thing that is really moving the 64-bit transition now is increased addressing for more memory and peripherals.
I would think the fact it is included with all purchases of Windows 7 and is available for more editions of Windows 7 are the reason.


Windows 7 has been out for 3 weeks, unless you count the RTM and RC releases. Windows 7 has had little influence so far in my opinion because it's not even out there.

It will probably have influence as time goes along, but it has little to none so far on 64-bit adoption in the industry.
_________________
TransCorp - Home of the Dual Orb 2, Cho Mahou Tairyku Wozz, and Emerald Dragon SFC/SNES translations.
ROMhacking.net - The central hub of the ROM hacking community.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
odditude
Official tech support dood


Joined: 25 Jan 2006
Posts: 1090

PostPosted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 2:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nightcrawler wrote:
franpa wrote:
Nightcrawler wrote:
The only thing that is really moving the 64-bit transition now is increased addressing for more memory and peripherals.
I would think the fact it is included with all purchases of Windows 7 and is available for more editions of Windows 7 are the reason.

Windows 7 has been out for 3 weeks, unless you count the RTM and RC releases. Windows 7 has had little influence so far in my opinion because it's not even out there.

It will probably have influence as time goes along, but it has little to none so far on 64-bit adoption in the industry.

on the other hand, oems shipped pcs (both desktop and laptop) with vista x64 from day one. while still a fraction of total pcs shipped with vista, over almost three years it did create a statistically significant percentage of home pcs running x64.
_________________
Why yes, my shift key *IS* broken.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
franpa
Gecko snack


Joined: 21 Aug 2005
Posts: 2176
Location: Australia, Brisbane

PostPosted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 3:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I mean that Windows 7 has the greatest potential to push 64bit as 64bit is included with every retail purchase of home premium, pro, ultimate, enterprise editions. Where as with Vista it was only Ultimate and you could have either 32 or 64bit but not both for the one price, same with XP.
_________________
Core2 DUO e6750 @ 2.66GHZ, ASUS P5KC mb, 2 gig DDR2 800 RAM, 500g SATA2 HDD, X-FI Extreme Music, Nvidia Geforce 8800gt 512MB PCI-E, Windows Windows 7 RTM x64, Thermaltake 750watt Toughpower Power Supply, Thermaltake Armor+ MX case.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ZSNES board Forum Index -> Bug Reports/Feature Requests All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group