View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Thu Feb 21, 2019 8:04 pm



Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 
Discussion about the future of the Docs 
Author Message
Veteran

Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2004 12:26 am
Posts: 907
Reply with quote
Post Discussion about the future of the Docs
I'll get straight to the point.

I've been doing a little thinking about the eventual move of the Documentation Project from SourceForge to BountySource. While I like the idea of better unity between the two projects (as in, both being hosted in the same trunk/server), I see a small potential problem.

The problem is, if the ZDP is hosted in the same SVN trunk as ZSNES, wouldn't the commit messages between the two projects both appear together on the CIA page? Or will we just host the ZDP in a separate trunk as it is currently?

Another thing I've been thinking about is the ZSNES website, ZSNES.com. As we're all aware, some of it is quite out of date. As a solution, I'm thinking we could:

1. Give the Doc Team access to the ZSNES project on SourceForge. From there, we will be able to update the ZSNES website (zsnes.sf.net). Of course I'm aware that we will probably have to make negotiations with _Demo_.
2. Start hosting the ZDP there. Or instead if we want to move it to BountySource, that's fine too.

With that done, we will delete the zsnes-docs project from SourceForge.

So, the main goal here is to get ZSNES.com updated. I probably wouldn't have time to work on the site much now, but some of us may at least be able to get some of the older content updated. And I have no interest in completely overhauling the site and giving it a new theme.

So, does anyone have any opinions/comments/criticisms about this?


Wed Jan 24, 2007 10:37 pm
Profile
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 10:54 pm
Posts: 3901
Location: Solar powered park bench
Reply with quote
Post 
Only _Demo_ has access to the main website. There is no site on zsnes.sf.com

_________________
May 9 2007 - NSRT 3.4, now with lots of hashing and even more accurate information! Go download it.
_____________
Insane Coding


Wed Jan 24, 2007 11:29 pm
Profile WWW
Veteran

Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2004 12:26 am
Posts: 907
Reply with quote
Post 
Nach wrote:
Only _Demo_ has access to the main website. There is no site on zsnes.sf.com
Which is why I said that we would have to make negotiations with him. I would imagine that zsnes.sf.net does exist, except it just redirects to www.zsnes.com.


Wed Jan 24, 2007 11:34 pm
Profile
Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 8:18 pm
Posts: 768
Reply with quote
Post 
In relation to all this, why isn't Bountysource used to host file releases?

Overall, it seems silly and is more work to maintain a project on multiple hosts.

Is it ever going to be a good idea for the Docs and ZSNES to be in the same repository? The people who work on each project are different. What's the likelihood that BS will ever implement the permissions thing for its SVN?

_________________
Official ZSNES Docs | NSRT Guide | Using a Wiimote w/ emulators


Thu Jan 25, 2007 12:38 am
Profile WWW
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer

Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am
Posts: 6747
Reply with quote
Post 
Jipcy wrote:
In relation to all this, why isn't Bountysource used to host file releases?


IIRC, brief discussion was that BS couldn't handle such load at the time.

Quote:
Overall, it seems silly and is more work to maintain a project on multiple hosts.


Pretty much.

Quote:
Is it ever going to be a good idea for the Docs and ZSNES to be in the same repository? The people who work on each project are different. What's the likelihood that BS will ever implement the permissions thing for its SVN?


In the end, I think the docs do need to be hosted along with ZSNES development, but neither should interfere with each other though (like, doc devs edit stuff in the main ZSNES branch). I dunno what is the status with BS though on the request... I probably will check it out.

_________________
Continuing FF4 Research...


Thu Jan 25, 2007 12:45 am
Profile
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 10:54 pm
Posts: 3901
Location: Solar powered park bench
Reply with quote
Post 
BS at this time can't handle this kind of battery and assault:
http://sourceforge.net/project/stats/de ... ckage_id=0

_________________
May 9 2007 - NSRT 3.4, now with lots of hashing and even more accurate information! Go download it.
_____________
Insane Coding


Thu Jan 25, 2007 1:05 am
Profile WWW
Veteran

Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2004 12:26 am
Posts: 907
Reply with quote
Post 
Excuse my ignorance, but what's the official reason for the move to BountySource anyway? My understanding is that SourceForge was down too often. Does BountySource offer any special enhancements over SourceForge?


Thu Jan 25, 2007 2:16 am
Profile
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer

Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am
Posts: 6747
Reply with quote
Post 
xamenus wrote:
Excuse my ignorance, but what's the official reason for the move to BountySource anyway? My understanding is that SourceForge was down too often.


That's all important, when you think about it. Stopping development because SF is down is not productive.

Quote:
Does BountySource offer any special enhancements over SourceForge?

Not that I think about it. At the very least, progress hasn't been stopped because of server stoppage.

_________________
Continuing FF4 Research...


Thu Jan 25, 2007 2:25 am
Profile
Veteran

Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2004 12:26 am
Posts: 907
Reply with quote
Post 
Deathlike2 wrote:
xamenus wrote:
Excuse my ignorance, but what's the official reason for the move to BountySource anyway? My understanding is that SourceForge was down too often.


That's all important, when you think about it. Stopping development because SF is down is not productive.
I agree. Which leads me back to my proposal in the original post: If we're going to have ZSNES hosted on two servers regardless, we might as well take advantage of the SF one and use it to update the site. Just my two cents.


Thu Jan 25, 2007 2:32 am
Profile
Trooper

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 4:37 pm
Posts: 361
Reply with quote
Post 
Nach wrote:
BS at this time can't handle this kind of battery and assault:
http://sourceforge.net/project/stats/de ... ckage_id=0


Wow. That's rather impressive.


Thu Jan 25, 2007 3:04 am
Profile WWW
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer

Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am
Posts: 6747
Reply with quote
Post 
xamenus wrote:
Deathlike2 wrote:
xamenus wrote:
Excuse my ignorance, but what's the official reason for the move to BountySource anyway? My understanding is that SourceForge was down too often.


That's all important, when you think about it. Stopping development because SF is down is not productive.
I agree. Which leads me back to my proposal in the original post: If we're going to have ZSNES hosted on two servers regardless, we might as well take advantage of the SF one and use it to update the site. Just my two cents.


What sounds a little more reasonable.. is do what is currently done.. like do development on a separate server and sync on release dates. (Obviously no development is done in SF, but it's to host the thing.) Seems more appropriate to me.

_________________
Continuing FF4 Research...


Thu Jan 25, 2007 3:10 am
Profile
Veteran

Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2004 12:26 am
Posts: 907
Reply with quote
Post 
Deathlike2 wrote:
xamenus wrote:
Deathlike2 wrote:
xamenus wrote:
Excuse my ignorance, but what's the official reason for the move to BountySource anyway? My understanding is that SourceForge was down too often.


That's all important, when you think about it. Stopping development because SF is down is not productive.
I agree. Which leads me back to my proposal in the original post: If we're going to have ZSNES hosted on two servers regardless, we might as well take advantage of the SF one and use it to update the site. Just my two cents.


What sounds a little more reasonable.. is do what is currently done.. like do development on a separate server and sync on release dates. (Obviously no development is done in SF, but it's to host the thing.) Seems more appropriate to me.
OK, that makes sense. So I guess we'd need to get a complete copy of the ZSNES website into the zsnes-docs SVN. I don't know how to do that, but it seems like a good idea.


Thu Jan 25, 2007 4:02 am
Profile
Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 8:18 pm
Posts: 768
Reply with quote
Post 
So, what's going on?

Is the plan to develop the zsnes.com main site in the zsnes-docs project, and then upload those changes occasionally?

I don't really see why we should use the old pages, but rather start anew.

I notice there are some google ads on the main page. Where does the money from those go? Will they be necessary in the future?

_________________
Official ZSNES Docs | NSRT Guide | Using a Wiimote w/ emulators


Thu Jan 25, 2007 4:47 am
Profile WWW
Veteran

Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2004 12:26 am
Posts: 907
Reply with quote
Post 
Jipcy wrote:
Is the plan to develop the zsnes.com main site in the zsnes-docs project, and then upload those changes occasionally?
It sounds good to me, though it's definitely a team decision that should be made. It's important that we get _Demo_'s approval, of course.


Thu Jan 25, 2007 5:17 am
Profile
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer

Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am
Posts: 6747
Reply with quote
Post 
Jipcy wrote:
So, what's going on?

Is the plan to develop the zsnes.com main site in the zsnes-docs project, and then upload those changes occasionally?

I don't really see why we should use the old pages, but rather start anew.


I'm not sure if I was clear... we don't touch the main site... we use SF for hosting the docs, but develop them elsewhere (BS).

Quote:
I notice there are some google ads on the main page. Where does the money from those go? Will they be necessary in the future?


It goes to Demo to pay for the server I suspect. I don't think it's an issue really. Might as well put some around... a few, but not-intrusive ads can't hurt. Note: You cannot use ads on pages hosted on SF anyways.

_________________
Continuing FF4 Research...


Thu Jan 25, 2007 6:25 am
Profile
Romhacking God

Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2004 11:27 pm
Posts: 922
Reply with quote
Post 
Haven't any of you(devs) spoken to Demo about allowing somebody to update the web page? This has been a ridiculous and unnecessary thorn in ZSNES for far too long. I'd just as soon go buy a new zsnes related domain and put up your own site if I were you, if he can't be reasoned with.

_________________
[url=http://transcorp.romhacking.net]TransCorp[/url] - Home of the Dual Orb 2, Cho Mahou Tairyku Wozz, and Emerald Dragon SFC/SNES translations.
[url=http://www.romhacking.net]ROMhacking.net[/url] - The central hub of the ROM hacking community.


Thu Jan 25, 2007 2:14 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 16 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by ST Software.