Megadrive Emulation - Gives me headaches

Announce new emulators, discuss which games run best under each emulator, and much much more.

Moderator: General Mods

Gil_Hamilton
Buzzkill Gil
Posts: 4294
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 7:14 pm

Post by Gil_Hamilton »

*hangs head in shame*
I shoulda known that.
AamirM
Regen Developer
Regen Developer
Posts: 533
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 8:01 am
Contact:

Post by AamirM »

Hi,

@ ProtoKnux:

FPS drops like that can indicate problems in either sound card or video card (since you said you're using vsync). I don't understand why other emulators don't exhibit this problem and only Megadrive emus are doing this (voodoo doll of a MD pinned somewhere??). There is an option in Kega called "Use Alternate Timing". Check that if it solves the problem. Also try and use high priority settings in each emulator. Then there is the setting of "SoundBufferSize" in Regen.ini file try playing with that to see if it solves the problem. There is nothing wrong with the specs of your PC. I have a very shit PC compared to yours (with both onboard video and sound) but all the three emus run perfectly. But since you mentioned that there is a problem with your mobo so that maybe the source of problem as well. But I still don't understand why only MD emulators are doing this.

stay safe,

AamirM
franpa
Gecko snack
Posts: 2374
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 11:06 am
Location: Australia, QLD
Contact:

Post by franpa »

maybe MD emulators display at a odd ball frequency?
Core i7 920 @ 2.66GHZ | ASUS P6T Motherboard | 8GB DDR3 1600 RAM | Gigabyte Geforce 760 4GB | Windows 10 Pro x64
ProtoKnux
Rookie
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 5:04 pm

Post by ProtoKnux »

Gil_Hamilton wrote:So... your motherboard is broken, and you neglect to mention this? That seems like it might fall under the header of relevant information.
Having problems with the IDE channels doesn't mean so much, but yeah, my mobo is a bit "broken" if you understand some parts not working as that.
AamirM wrote:Hi,

@ ProtoKnux:

FPS drops like that can indicate problems in either sound card or video card (since you said you're using vsync). I don't understand why other emulators don't exhibit this problem and only Megadrive emus are doing this (voodoo doll of a MD pinned somewhere??). There is an option in Kega called "Use Alternate Timing". Check that if it solves the problem. Also try and use high priority settings in each emulator. Then there is the setting of "SoundBufferSize" in Regen.ini file try playing with that to see if it solves the problem. There is nothing wrong with the specs of your PC. I have a very shit PC compared to yours (with both onboard video and sound) but all the three emus run perfectly. But since you mentioned that there is a problem with your mobo so that maybe the source of problem as well. But I still don't understand why only MD emulators are doing this.

stay safe,

AamirM
I don't think 59 fps are going to be "FPS drops", and I think some games run at that speed and that's why I see the FPS meter like that. I can even run some games on nullDC, at 60 fps with glitchy stuff (logically), so the problem focuses on Megadrive. The only problem I have with emulation is that TFT screens are shit, I see Mario's ghosts everywhere, but that's my fault for buying cheap shit.

Anyway, high priority settings don't help me, and as I said before Regen does not have that sound problem, it has frame skips, but I should try that. I think is just my motherboard, I'm pretty sure now.

Thanks for the help, I'm going to upgrade my PC because I think it's time already. I'll come back tomorrow to report the emulation status with the new motherboard/CPU/RAM.
AamirM
Regen Developer
Regen Developer
Posts: 533
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 8:01 am
Contact:

Post by AamirM »

Hi,

Well, since you have that PC right now can you test something? Can you enable VSync while in being windowed mode and enable turbo mode (backspace key) and see if it creates any frame skips/sound skips?

stay safe,

AamirM
ProtoKnux
Rookie
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 5:04 pm

Post by ProtoKnux »

AamirM wrote:Hi,

Well, since you have that PC right now can you test something? Can you enable VSync while in being windowed mode and enable turbo mode (backspace key) and see if it creates any frame skips/sound skips?

stay safe,

AamirM
I have tried that, and I have even more frame skips and now sound skips (I hadn't before). Does that help?
odditude
Official tech support dood
Posts: 2120
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 7:57 am

Post by odditude »

ProtoKnux wrote:
Gil_Hamilton wrote:So... your motherboard is broken, and you neglect to mention this? That seems like it might fall under the header of relevant information.
Having problems with the IDE channels doesn't mean so much, but yeah, my mobo is a bit "broken" if you understand some parts not working as that.
Yeah, it only means that the southbridge is failing. In your case, the nForce4 is a single-chip design, so when I say "southbridge" I mean "chipset."

Having the single most important logical component on your motherboard in a failing state definitely qualifies as more than "a bit broken."

Get yourself some working hardware; until then, there's a >50% chance any issues you're having are due to chipset problems.
Why yes, my shift key *IS* broken.
AamirM
Regen Developer
Regen Developer
Posts: 533
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 8:01 am
Contact:

Post by AamirM »

Hi,
I have tried that, and I have even more frame skips and now sound skips (I hadn't before). Does that help?
Yeah. It confirms something is wrong with your PC and not the MD emulators :) . But I still can't understand why the hell other emulators are running fine. Only ZSNES can be expected to run fine since its fast as hell even on a broken computer ;) .

stay safe,

AamirM
tetsuo55
Regular
Posts: 307
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 3:17 pm

Post by tetsuo55 »

Your system seems to support 64bit os's.

64bit os's(expecially vista) is a LOT faster when it comes to 2d stuff. And which faster i mean up to 10x. This difference could be enough to eliminate some of the tearing.

I believe every emulator has a 2d mode and a 3d mode, make sure you try both now, and set it to 2d if you try 64bit
odditude
Official tech support dood
Posts: 2120
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 7:57 am

Post by odditude »

tetsuo55 wrote:64bit os's(expecially vista) is a LOT faster when it comes to 2d stuff. And which faster i mean up to 10x.
where did you come up with that information..? cite sources, please.
Why yes, my shift key *IS* broken.
Deathlike2
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer
Posts: 6747
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am

Post by Deathlike2 »

odditude wrote:
tetsuo55 wrote:64bit os's(expecially vista) is a LOT faster when it comes to 2d stuff. And which faster i mean up to 10x.
where did you come up with that information..? cite sources, please.
I'm just wondering where this crappy info comes from. Really, it's just a funny as Quad-Core means stuff is 4x faster.
Continuing [url=http://slickproductions.org/forum/index.php?board=13.0]FF4[/url] Research...
ProtoKnux
Rookie
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 5:04 pm

Post by ProtoKnux »

Deathlike2 wrote:
odditude wrote:
tetsuo55 wrote:64bit os's(expecially vista) is a LOT faster when it comes to 2d stuff. And which faster i mean up to 10x.
where did you come up with that information..? cite sources, please.
I'm just wondering where this crappy info comes from. Really, it's just a funny as Quad-Core means stuff is 4x faster.
And AFAIK x64 and Vista 64 emulate 32 bit apps, so I don't think that statement is valid, but let's wait for a response.
Gil_Hamilton
Buzzkill Gil
Posts: 4294
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 7:14 pm

Post by Gil_Hamilton »

tetsuo55 wrote:Your system seems to support 64bit os's.

64bit os's(expecially vista) is a LOT faster when it comes to 2d stuff. And which faster i mean up to 10x. This difference could be enough to eliminate some of the tearing.

I believe every emulator has a 2d mode and a 3d mode, make sure you try both now, and set it to 2d if you try 64bit
Image

Times two.
I.S.T.
Zealot
Posts: 1325
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 7:03 am

Post by I.S.T. »

ProtoKnux wrote:
Deathlike2 wrote:
odditude wrote:
tetsuo55 wrote:64bit os's(expecially vista) is a LOT faster when it comes to 2d stuff. And which faster i mean up to 10x.
where did you come up with that information..? cite sources, please.
I'm just wondering where this crappy info comes from. Really, it's just a funny as Quad-Core means stuff is 4x faster.
And AFAIK x64 and Vista 64 emulate 32 bit apps, so I don't think that statement is valid, but let's wait for a response.
I think they translate it rather than emulate it, but I could be wrong.
Deathlike2
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer
Posts: 6747
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am

Post by Deathlike2 »

Does anyone read anything on backwards compatibility for these systems?

There is no emulation involved here. There is no translation being done here. It is all native to the processor. 16-bit stuff may be emulated (not that it matters), but it's all freaking native.
Continuing [url=http://slickproductions.org/forum/index.php?board=13.0]FF4[/url] Research...
King Of Chaos
Trooper
Posts: 394
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 3:11 am
Location: Space

Post by King Of Chaos »

AamirM wrote:Hi,

Well, since you have that PC right now can you test something? Can you enable VSync while in being windowed mode and enable turbo mode (backspace key) and see if it creates any frame skips/sound skips?
Hmmm, I thought turbo mode doesn't work while VSync is enabled in the latest beta (in windowed mode)... unless I'm missing something.
[url=http://www.eidolons-inn.net/tiki-index.php?page=Kega]Kega Fusion Supporter[/url] | [url=http://byuu.cinnamonpirate.com/]bsnes Supporter[/url] | [url=http://aamirm.hacking-cult.org/]Regen Supporter[/url]
AamirM
Regen Developer
Regen Developer
Posts: 533
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 8:01 am
Contact:

Post by AamirM »

Hi,
Hmmm, I thought turbo mode doesn't work while VSync is enabled in the latest beta (in windowed mode)... unless I'm missing something.
Yes, you are right. But turbo mode completely disables timing sync and lets the emu run as fast as it can but since vsync is enabled it won't since the DX will block the emu until vblank. So in effect, we are swithing from syncing to sound to syncing to video ;) . Just like bsnes has those two options.

stay safe,

AamirM
tetsuo55
Regular
Posts: 307
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 3:17 pm

Post by tetsuo55 »

odditude wrote:where did you come up with that information..? cite sources, please.
Sources for 64bit being faster, especially in the 2d area

http://winbeta.org/forums/index.php?act=ST&f=34&t=9186

http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vis ... hmark.html

3d results for 64bit are getting better and better with each new driver release, i have no source but IIRC either ATI or Nvidia already crossed the 32bit performance boundry

And those are just the perfomance reasons.

-64bit feels snappier in use
-64bit provides extra layers of security rendering a lot of exploits and virusses inert(more so in vista/server2008 and even more with DEP enabled)
When an application is coded with 64bit in mind or optimised compiled for 64bit it will be faster than the 32bit version, up to 2x faster.

You can easily see this being true when checking out the MAME benchmarks
Deathlike2 wrote:I'm just wondering where this crappy info comes from. Really, it's just a funny as Quad-Core means stuff is 4x faster.
Now if i had said that it would have been funny indeed :)
ProtoKnux wrote:And AFAIK x64 and Vista 64 emulate 32 bit apps, so I don't think that statement is valid, but let's wait for a response.
As Deathlike2 explained there is no emulation.
Gil_Hamilton wrote:Image

Times two.
You mean high truth, you chose the wrong image
I.S.T. wrote:I think they translate it rather than emulate it, but I could be wrong.
It basically works the same as a Glide-Wrapper. This means more perfomance is some areas and a loss of performance in others.

On average perfomance is equal
Deathlike2
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer
Posts: 6747
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am

Post by Deathlike2 »

tetsuo55 wrote:
odditude wrote:where did you come up with that information..? cite sources, please.
Sources for 64bit being faster, especially in the 2d area

http://winbeta.org/forums/index.php?act=ST&f=34&t=9186

http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vis ... hmark.html
Useless, it tells me nothing. You said 10x faster not 10% faster as quoted in one of your links.
3d results for 64bit are getting better and better with each new driver release, i have no source but IIRC either ATI or Nvidia already crossed the 32bit performance boundry
Last I checked, there were still issues in simply getting it to work across the board.
And those are just the perfomance reasons.

-64bit feels snappier in use
-64bit provides extra layers of security rendering a lot of exploits and virusses inert(more so in vista/server2008 and even more with DEP enabled)
When an application is coded with 64bit in mind or optimised compiled for 64bit it will be faster than the 32bit version, up to 2x faster.
What BS are you quoting?

Gil_Hamilton wrote:Image

Times two.
You mean high truth, you chose the wrong image
No, Gil's on target.
Continuing [url=http://slickproductions.org/forum/index.php?board=13.0]FF4[/url] Research...
tetsuo55
Regular
Posts: 307
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 3:17 pm

Post by tetsuo55 »

Deathlike2 wrote:Useless, it tells me nothing. You said 10x faster not 10% faster as quoted in one of your links.
Did you even bother actually looking at the benchmark result graph in the first link?

Especially lines, and shapes xp vs vista 64bit
Deathlike2 wrote:Last I checked, there were still issues in simply getting it to work across the board.
Depends on how long ago you checked. Things have changed dramatically over the last 6-12 months
Deathlike2 wrote:
Tetsuo55 wrote:And those are just the perfomance reasons.

-64bit feels snappier in use
-64bit provides extra layers of security rendering a lot of exploits and virusses inert(more so in vista/server2008 and even more with DEP enabled)
When an application is coded with 64bit in mind or optimised compiled for 64bit it will be faster than the 32bit version, up to 2x faster.
What BS are you quoting?
-Snappierness is from personal experience and hearsay
-Extra security:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/946765
-Compiled for 64bit being faster:
http://mameui.classicgaming.gamespy.com/Bench.htm

Deathlike2 wrote:
Tetsuo55 wrote:
Gil_Hamilton wrote:Image

Times two.
You mean high truth, you chose the wrong image
No, Gil's on target.
Nope hes still completely wrong.

----------

I fully understand the misconceptions over 64bit. But the last year has changed a lot for 64bit. The last 6 months have turned it into a slipstream.

People are taking it seriously to the point where some manufacturers supply vista-64 as the default os for their hardware.
http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/37279/135/
Deathlike2
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer
Posts: 6747
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am

Post by Deathlike2 »

tetsuo55 wrote:64bit os's(expecially vista) is a LOT faster when it comes to 2d stuff. And which faster i mean up to 10x. This difference could be enough to eliminate some of the tearing.
Let me repeat, I'm not misquoting you here, that's what you said.

Additionally, I cannot trust benchmarks that freaking use a 5400RPM hard drive as a test. Seriously, I don't care. In that same thread, other guys are refuting said test. Heck, none of these tests are really conclusive to anything other than real world experience would know.

I've read such driver reviews before.. there's never enough Vista drivers sucks threads in the proposed ATI+NVidia specific forums that never cease to amaze me.. if it's not "it sucks", it's "some game runs suckily".

I'm specificially question the following comments:

"-64bit feels snappier in use" - that's sheer opinion based on... what? it's not going to make everything magically better.
When an application is coded with 64bit in mind or optimised compiled for 64bit it will be faster than the 32bit version, up to 2x faster.
2x faster might mean something on a server, but in terms of games, not even close. Then again, 2x is not a number you're getting from a proper benchmark. A benchmark score doesn't mean a system is exactly x% faster in the proper sense of the word, especially when it has its own biases.

Again, I'm not against 64-bit OSes, but I think you're completely exagerrating the benefits. I still use 100% 32-bit programs, so I could care less what insane propaganda to tell me that 64-bit is the way to go. 64-bit does not make stuff magically better as I said. I'd rather you not go saying that it makes your system fly into outer space... because that's not what it will do on its own.
Continuing [url=http://slickproductions.org/forum/index.php?board=13.0]FF4[/url] Research...
tetsuo55
Regular
Posts: 307
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 3:17 pm

Post by tetsuo55 »

The link posted does show a 10x improvement in some individual benchmarks. But that doesn't really matter.


A better way to describe it would be:

Windows seems to respond instantly to commands, ALT+TAB's go smoothly and are fast. While gaming FPS is slightly lower but the average FPS is higher and while playing the game is noticably smoother(less stutters)

One of the reasons has to do with some memory allocation thing that i am currently unable to find a source for.
It basically has something to do with the way memory allocations are stored and the 64bit os can swith between them instantly where in a 32bit os the request would get stuck in a queue.
Deathlike2 wrote: I'd rather you not go saying that it makes your system fly into outer space... because that's not what it will do on its own.
Thats what you're making out of something i have proven to be true.

But i will give you that overall the 2d gain was not 10x, only for some of the functions.

You say you have read a bunch of reviews. Why don't you try it?
Deathlike2
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer
Posts: 6747
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am

Post by Deathlike2 »

That sounds more like what a fresh install of Windows would do, not what 64-bit does. I could easily experience that for any comp, with any OS that the system was optimal for. That tells me absolutely nothing.

There is absolutely no reason for me to switch. The reason when I switched from 98SE to 2k is to willingly forgo certain things I liked about 9x (well, some of the DOS only apps anyways). There is absolutely no compelling reason for me to switch. Until I have a reason for it, I won't switch. Stop trying.
Continuing [url=http://slickproductions.org/forum/index.php?board=13.0]FF4[/url] Research...
tetsuo55
Regular
Posts: 307
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 3:17 pm

Post by tetsuo55 »

Deathlike2 wrote:That sounds more like what a fresh install of Windows would do, not what 64-bit does. I could easily experience that for any comp, with any OS that the system was optimal for. That tells me absolutely nothing.

There is absolutely no reason for me to switch. The reason when I switched from 98SE to 2k is to willingly forgo certain things I liked about 9x (well, some of the DOS only apps anyways). There is absolutely no compelling reason for me to switch. Until I have a reason for it, I won't switch. Stop trying.
I'm not trying to convince you to use 64bit.
I'm saying that your personal opinions on the speed of lack theroff of 64bit don't count untill you try it yourself.

PS
win98 beats 64bit in any benchmark with ease because both xp and vista are shit slow when compared to win98
Last edited by tetsuo55 on Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Deathlike2
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer
Posts: 6747
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am

Post by Deathlike2 »

tetsuo55 wrote:
Deathlike2 wrote:That sounds more like what a fresh install of Windows would do, not what 64-bit does. I could easily experience that for any comp, with any OS that the system was optimal for. That tells me absolutely nothing.
Even smoother than a fresh install of a 32bit windows, and the speed stays. Even with a bunch of applications running and after a long time of not formatting(6months)
Can you not get it through your thick skull? I'm not interested in migrating. I have no use for it at the moment. I don't care. I don't want any compatibility issues with what I have.

In other words, stop trying to convince me otherwise.
Continuing [url=http://slickproductions.org/forum/index.php?board=13.0]FF4[/url] Research...
Post Reply