HDMI-Enabled Graphics Cards Debut
Moderator: General Mods
what's wrong with the old vga stuff I've been using all my life? I run 2 screens with it, and have never seen any problems like color banding and shit.
[url=http://www.alexchiu.com/affiliates/clickthru.cgi?id=phonymike]ultimate immortality[/url]
[url=http://www.sloganizer.net/en/][img]http://www.sloganizer.net/en/image,zsnes,white,purple.png[/img][/url]
[url=http://www.sloganizer.net/en/][img]http://www.sloganizer.net/en/image,zsnes,white,purple.png[/img][/url]
If you're using analog monitors, VGA is perfect. If you're using LCD monitors, however, all-digital DVI connections are superior. Unfortunately Vista will degrade the visual quality of flagged content if you have a non-HDCP digital connection to your monitor. DVI-HDCP gets around this and DVI-HDCP video cards have been around for at least the last few months. DVI and DVI-HDCP use exactly the same signal format as HDMI and are backwards compatible, but don't transmit audio through the same cable. Most of the time this wouldn't be a problem, but many TV's, like mine, only have separate audio inputs on 1 of their HDMI ports, hence the need for a video card that outputs audio through the same cable. Plus it's nice to have a single cable connecting to the TV if you have lots of stuff in your entertainment center.
[i]"It is better to have tried and failed than to have failed to try, but the result's the same." - Mike Dennison[/i]
I probably should've worded 'everything looks pixel perfect'. It may not be absolute perfection you'd achieve with digital but it does look good. At any rate, I have no need to go for the premium for something I won't be able to notice.
Do the faults of VGA become more apparent at higher resolutions or something? I'm only using 1280x1024 on mine.
Do the faults of VGA become more apparent at higher resolutions or something? I'm only using 1280x1024 on mine.
-
- Romhacking God
- Posts: 922
- Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2004 11:27 pm
- Contact:
I have a Samsung Syncmaster 710t with both VGA and DVI input. I can certainly tell the difference between the two. VGA still looks GOOD, but DVI looks better. It's a fairly minor difference, but it's certainly visible at 1280x1024.
[url=http://transcorp.romhacking.net]TransCorp[/url] - Home of the Dual Orb 2, Cho Mahou Tairyku Wozz, and Emerald Dragon SFC/SNES translations.
[url=http://www.romhacking.net]ROMhacking.net[/url] - The central hub of the ROM hacking community.
[url=http://www.romhacking.net]ROMhacking.net[/url] - The central hub of the ROM hacking community.
The best part about DVI is that the resolution changes are much faster and your monitor doesn't have to fiddle with the image. The video card (not the LCD) will also handle the stretching for non-native Rez, and I believe will even allow you to turn it off.
SHREIK!!!!!!! DDdddnnnnnnaaaa! GESTAHLLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!!!
Steelers now officially own your ass.
Steelers now officially own your ass.
I guess it's something I'll have to see for myself. I'll have a look around the shops one time.
I don't like that moment of 'black screen' when switching resolutions but I absolutely hate it when I'm doing something that needs constant switching between them, like following instructions for a full screen game. If I notice the quality or the price is just right my next monitor will probably be DVI.kevman wrote:The best part about DVI is that the resolution changes are much faster...
The 8800 is already HDCP-compliant. The only thing the cards are lacking to get it up to HDMI is the audio encoder, which just has to transcode audio from the soundcard and shouldn't be difficult to add to new models, or even add externally to any HDCP-compliant card.Cyrus wrote:The X1600 Pro and 7600GT aren't exactly powerful video cards. I would imagine they'd support such things for higher end models such as the upcoming X2800/X2900 series or the current GeForce 8800 series but this is the first time I've heard of it.
[i]"It is better to have tried and failed than to have failed to try, but the result's the same." - Mike Dennison[/i]
-
- ZSNES Developer
- Posts: 6747
- Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am
They are more than adequate at their price points though the latter is generally a better option.Cyrus wrote:The X1600 Pro and 7600GT aren't exactly powerful video cards. I would imagine they'd support such things for higher end models such as the upcoming X2800/X2900 series or the current GeForce 8800 series but this is the first time I've heard of it.
Continuing [url=http://slickproductions.org/forum/index.php?board=13.0]FF4[/url] Research...