ZSNES board

xBR > HQXX

Was a demo release for a demoparty.

Look up demoscene on Wikipedia to understand.

http://pouet.net/prod.php?which=59369 should shut up all the byuu lovers saying I troll him all the time................ That took a lot more than the time needed to troll byuu. Oh about the party: Was epic, tons of C64's. Tons of releases. Tons of gigs. Tons of booze Never expected a win out of def...

Yes, all copy protections these days work the same way: wrapping all code in a envelope and decrypting it in real time, like a virus.

Avira is shitware, TR/Crypt.XPACK.Gen on the following code: BITS 32 global _pe_loader section .text LOADER_START_MAGIC equ 0xC0DE1111 LOADER_END_MAGIC equ 0xC0DE2222 LOADER_DATA equ 0xC0DE3333 _pe_loader: dd LOADER_START_MAGIC pushad call GetBasePointer GetBasePointer: pop ebp sub ebp, GetBasePoint...

And how would you do that?
Emulate cart interfaces like how C64 emulators do it, by emulating the actual I/O interfaces?

All SNES emus just read the ROM as a array, no delays involved.

Updated to support XP, uploaded to proper section of site, requires valid keys or some kind of crack (duh) to work.

Let's play's are like having your dick sawn off while cumming on some bitch.

Sure, there is fun, but wouldnt you rather be having the full experience?

Gil_Hamilton wrote:

lordmissus wrote:Well, being an aspie

You mean a high-functioning autistic. Asperger's syndrome is no longer recognized as a unique disorder.

As much I don't agree with you sometimes, I agree. Wasn't it removed in DSM V or something?

-deleted- and for the people who hate me dissing Chairman Marjin Byuu.... http://mudlord.info/temp/mugbx.exe go lynch. for those not in the know and who I respect, its a gb (and down the road gbc/whatever) emulator. Mainly done to help test code thats not in VBA currently, so uses a from scratch cor...

http://glide64.emuxhaven.net/

sorry grinvader: shakeshake is dead. D:

they need patching to work
though some would rather they make a windows > windows emulator.

Anyone know of any shaders that distort/warp the screen so that you can play all games in " touch fuzzy, get dizzy " mode? With the advent of direct3d shaders in videogames, trippy effects are an absolute must! Ive seen a curved screen shader on youtube I wrote a shader that did just that...

More than once, that unneeded accuracy has been needed for my usage, so I gravitate towards the most accurate emulator that I can actually run. So subcycle accuracy is warranted, and needed? Even if it only benefits 1 title, with a massive performance loss? And even if cycle accuracy is enough for ...

Long story short.... I leaked the existance of his DS emulator. He got pissed off with that and banned me for eternity from the #mednafen IRC Sorry you got your ISP yelling at ya, mudlord. Its fine, I just have to be 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000x more cautious than I used to be about wh...

But it still most likely was one of your "friends"...........
Then again, tons of people want me dead too....

* People from here
* byuu
* exophase
* people from ngemu
* people from emutalk
* people from some IRCs

need I go on?

I.S.T. wrote: We really need to do this, guys? Really?

Yes, because the existance of ONE emulator is enough to get one person killed.
Or at the very least, trolled until your ISP is contacted. Which means you get a lovely letter in the mail.

kode54 wrote:Both of those drivers implement DirectMusic support, just not DLS capability. If you need that, the stock DirectMusic synthesizer is sufficient.

And DLS support relies on BASSMIDI itself supporting DLS. Which I doubt Ian will add.

Oh boo hoo, tell someone who cares.
Like the inhabitants of your new home, which worship the abomination that is 30 bit color.

Oh the irony, 30 bit color and colorblind?

And JB can go ride byuu's razor dildo.

Like I told him to.
Thats what you get for practically being in bed with the enemy.

*shameless plug*

http://bassmididrv.mudlord.info/
http://www.mudlord.info/crap/audio/vstmididrv.exe

You are fucking welcome. >_>
Not.

lordmissus wrote:This forum shit is getting old.

zzzzzz

Drinking from the well of bitterness are we?

Rashidi wrote:yeah, obfuscation+packing would only attract unwanted 'false positive' from most anti-whatever out there.

There would be false positives regardless. Adding extra layers of DRM will only exacerbate the problem .
Most commercial protectors get around this by paying the AV devs off....

paulguy wrote:Name reminds me too much of fudgepack. Probably should do something about that, unless it was intended. :p

Suggestions?

*shameless plug*

http://mudpack.mudlord.info

mudpack is a EXE only Win32 PE packer. Unlike UPX, it has fully modular compression/decompression modules via plugins.

It is not intended to be DRM, so it makes things super easy to depack.