SNESGT Ver 0.230 beta6 out

powerspike · Post by **powerspike** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 1:21 am

Sounds like it would work real well with the delicious hot pocket plug-in. :O~

neo_bahamut1985 · Post by **neo_bahamut1985** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 1:27 am

Gil_Hamilton wrote: IV Drip plugin

What on earth is that??

Gil_Hamilton · Post by **Gil_Hamilton** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 1:32 am

neo_bahamut1985 wrote:
Gil_Hamilton wrote: IV Drip plugin
What on earth is that??

It's the plugin that makes Firefox a cancer cure. Can't you read?

DancemasterGlenn · Post by **DancemasterGlenn** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 7:47 am

Hahaha. Priceless.

EDIT: Also...

Oh, and beta5 is great!

Why must you torment yourself so?? If you're going to use firefox3 at all, please don't use a copy that's two releases old.

EDIT 2: Okay, the title "release candidate" in itself means that me using "release" is not peoper terminology... what am I thinking of when I say two releases old? Two updates? Two versions?

neo_bahamut1985 · Post by **neo_bahamut1985** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 3:04 pm

Funny that you say that, I was talking about SnesGT and not Firefox...I only stick to the official (non-illegal) releases of said web browser, thank you very much. Sorry if that wasn't clear.

franpa · Post by **franpa** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 3:13 pm

UM, It is open source and NOT illegal to view/use the "public beta"s of the browser including release candidates.

neo_bahamut1985 · Post by **neo_bahamut1985** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 3:37 pm

I'm just trying to rectify what DancemasterGlenn said; he said "why must I torture myself, etc" I already said it: I'm not talking about Firefox but SnesGT 0.230 beta5.

DancemasterGlenn · Post by **DancemasterGlenn** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 8:53 pm

neo_bahamut1985 wrote:I only stick to the official (non-illegal) releases of said web browser, thank you very much.

Hahaha. You're amazing. I haven't laughed that hard in a while, thank you for that.

Either way, can't blame me for getting mixed up when you speak of switching to firefox and a new version of an emulator that both happen to have recently had a beta 5. that was my bad, though.

neo_bahamut1985 · Post by **neo_bahamut1985** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:01 pm

That was my fault for mixing that up...sorry about that.

DancemasterGlenn · Post by **DancemasterGlenn** » Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:46 pm

No worries, man.

Gil_Hamilton · Post by **Gil_Hamilton** » Thu Jun 12, 2008 5:13 am

I run nightlies of Seamonkey.
I don't remember why I switched from the last release to nightlies. Especially since 2.0 still needs a bit of work before it's ready for prime-time.

Gary_Oak · Post by **Gary_Oak** » Tue Aug 26, 2008 11:52 pm

Anybody knows if this emulator is still alive?

byuu · Post by **byuu** » Wed Aug 27, 2008 12:44 am

It is.

neo_bahamut1985 · Post by **neo_bahamut1985** » Wed Aug 27, 2008 2:48 am

unlike snes9x....

adventure_of_link · Post by **adventure_of_link** » Wed Aug 27, 2008 4:26 am

neo_bahamut1985 wrote:unlike snes9x....

shut up

also you fail at size tags

DancemasterGlenn · Post by **DancemasterGlenn** » Wed Aug 27, 2008 4:53 am

adventure_of_link wrote:also you fail at size tags

Would have been even better if you had used said tags in your comeback. Still funny, though.

I.S.T. · Post by **I.S.T.** » Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:03 am

neo_bahamut1985 wrote:unlike snes9x....

Haven't you been corrected about that like five times?

Or was that franpa...

franpa · Post by **franpa** » Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:27 am

It was him, I've told him numerous times that he should GTFO if he wishes to keep spamming the place with lies about the state of SNES9x.

Post by **odditude** » Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:36 am

he's another one that's supplanting franpa as the source of idiocy on the boards...

at least he's not as blatantly obnoxious as franky.

neo_bahamut1985 · Post by **neo_bahamut1985** » Wed Aug 27, 2008 7:08 am

I.S.T. wrote:
neo_bahamut1985 wrote:unlike snes9x....
Haven't you been corrected about that like five times?

Or was that franpa...

Yes. I just wanted to say it.

End Snes9x spamming...now.

I.S.T. · Post by **I.S.T.** » Wed Aug 27, 2008 7:14 am

creaothceann · Post by **creaothceann** » Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:57 am

Gary_Oak · Post by **Gary_Oak** » Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:00 pm

neo_bahamut1985 wrote:
I.S.T. wrote:
neo_bahamut1985 wrote:unlike snes9x....
Haven't you been corrected about that like five times?

Or was that franpa...

Yes. I just wanted to say it.

End Snes9x spamming...now.

I believe that Snes9x is alive, but I certainly haven't heard anything more from it.

powerspike · Post by **powerspike** » Sat Aug 30, 2008 7:36 am

Happy days, a new SNESGT is released! Looks like it has some shiny SPC7110 emulation too. :]

SNESGT 0.230 beta6 (English version)

What's new
- Fixed several freeze or instability bugs which are caused by
　some changes between beta4 and beta5.
　Ver 0.230 beta5 freeze in many titles, and it is fixed.
- Some minor bugs are fixed.
- Improved emulation accuracy.
- Added support for SPC7110 emulation.
　The format of RTC file(.rtc) which includes time data of SPC7110/S-RTC
　is compatible with bsnes.
　SPC7110 emulation code is provided by byuu(bsnes author).
　I thank him for his support and everything.

* Language files for beta6 is compatible with beta5, so you can use
　same language files for beta5 in beta6.

http://gigo.retrogames.com/bbs/c-board. ... o=1075;id=

Awakened · Post by **Awakened** » Mon Sep 01, 2008 2:18 am

WTF, when I try to load a ROM with this emu (.230 beta 6 english version), it crashes and Windows says it prevented something with DEP (Data Execution Prevention). I tried going and adding SnesGT to the DEP exception list, but it doesn't let me. I'm running Vista SP1. I've never seen such an error.