is it possible to disable the bottom lines?

General area for talk about ZSNES. The best place to ask for related questions as well as troubleshooting.

Moderator: ZSNES Mods

Tallgeese
Justice is Blind
Posts: 620
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Test
Contact:

Post by Tallgeese »

Say again?
franpa
Gecko snack
Posts: 2374
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 11:06 am
Location: Australia, QLD
Contact:

Post by franpa »

Metatron wrote:You're forgetting that you're assuming -S for that to even work out appreciably. Unless you're seriously suggesting that the top half of the screen be one rather sizeable black bar.
er, who's asking who? xD

but seriously (yes i can be serious in some insane way :() who was this post aimed at?
Last edited by franpa on Fri Jan 26, 2007 2:10 am, edited 2 times in total.
Core i7 920 @ 2.66GHZ | ASUS P6T Motherboard | 8GB DDR3 1600 RAM | Gigabyte Geforce 760 4GB | Windows 10 Pro x64
Tallgeese
Justice is Blind
Posts: 620
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Test
Contact:

Post by Tallgeese »

At blackmyst for suggesting to adjust your monitor settings to hide the bottom line. I was pointing out it doesn't work out very well in -R and Windowed modes.
franpa
Gecko snack
Posts: 2374
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 11:06 am
Location: Australia, QLD
Contact:

Post by franpa »

a fix is in the works i hear from the zsnes 1.51 announcement thread... so yay.

and thanks it all makes sense now.
Core i7 920 @ 2.66GHZ | ASUS P6T Motherboard | 8GB DDR3 1600 RAM | Gigabyte Geforce 760 4GB | Windows 10 Pro x64
blackmyst
Zealot
Posts: 1161
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 8:36 pm
Location: Place.

Post by blackmyst »

Metatron wrote:Anyhow. What about window modes, then? Doesn't damage the point either way. I'm simply pointing out that blackmyst's solution is unquestionably suboptimal.
Yeah well, it's better than nothing, isn't it. Which is what you have until somebody changes it.
[size=75][b]Procrastination.[/b]
Hard Work Often Pays Off After Time, but Laziness Always Pays Off Now.[/size]
Tallgeese
Justice is Blind
Posts: 620
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Test
Contact:

Post by Tallgeese »

I was operating under the assumption that it wasn't going to be changed, but if an option's going to be added, then yay.
clessoulis
Regular
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:22 am

Post by clessoulis »

I just finally figured out wtf you guys where talking about. Wtf resolution are you runing your screen in. LIke 800x600? Because theres no way you'd even hardly notice at anything above 1280x960. Which i'm sure most people are running by now. And at 1600x1200 I defanitly dont notice it.
franpa
Gecko snack
Posts: 2374
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 11:06 am
Location: Australia, QLD
Contact:

Post by franpa »

do you use the ntsc filter?
Core i7 920 @ 2.66GHZ | ASUS P6T Motherboard | 8GB DDR3 1600 RAM | Gigabyte Geforce 760 4GB | Windows 10 Pro x64
jez
Rookie
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:18 pm

Post by jez »

clessoulis wrote:I just finally figured out wtf you guys where talking about. Wtf resolution are you runing your screen in. LIke 800x600? Because theres no way you'd even hardly notice at anything above 1280x960. Which i'm sure most people are running by now. And at 1600x1200 I defanitly dont notice it.
640x480, actually. Because I hate blurry interpolation, and that's the only resolution that uses nearest-neighbour instead, so I get nice crisp pixels. And I might as well make best use of my CRT monitor's ability to change to all kinds of resolutions natively!
=== Jez ===
Post Reply