VBA-M

mudlord · Post by **mudlord** » Tue May 27, 2008 2:19 am

What are they actually, er, 'fixing' anyway?

Nothing. Really.

Just some lame resediting and shit.

Tallgeese · Post by **Tallgeese** » Tue May 27, 2008 2:20 am

...Wow, so they're basically resource hacking the name and about screens. Smooth.

Neo Kaiser · Post by **Neo Kaiser** » Tue May 27, 2008 2:36 am

v1.0.0-beta2 (Build: 202):

-added compression data format (hidden-mode)
-fixed DirectSound skip-bug
-fixed Direct3D boundary-glitch
-fixed some other minor bugs

How true is this?

I.S.T. · Post by **I.S.T.** » Tue May 27, 2008 2:39 am

all lies. They've lied in each and every change log they've ever posted.

Deathlike2 · Post by **Deathlike2** » Tue May 27, 2008 2:55 am

I could care less. No source, no substance.

snkcube · Post by **snkcube** » Tue May 27, 2008 3:17 am

Neo Kaiser wrote:VBA-Cloud would be more respected if they do their stuff using the source code. I guess that is beyond their skills.

lol "skills".

neo_bahamut1985 · Post by **neo_bahamut1985** » Tue May 27, 2008 3:35 am

Neo Kaiser wrote:v1.0.0-beta2 (Build: 202):

-added compression data format (hidden-mode)
-fixed DirectSound skip-bug
-fixed Direct3D boundary-glitch
-fixed some other minor bugs

How true is this?

Not true at all. Trying to steal other source codes and calling it their own is like trying to port Zsnes to the Nintendo DS; it just doesn't work. Either way, it makes you look like an idiot.

Neo Kaiser · Post by **Neo Kaiser** » Tue May 27, 2008 3:48 am

Just as I thought as I don't see any difference at all. Their accomplishments are 0. There is no need to talk anymore about them on this thread. Case close VBA-Cloudian, Cloud or whatever is a fraud as was stated pages before on this thread.

neo_bahamut1985 · Post by **neo_bahamut1985** » Tue May 27, 2008 3:51 am

Someone should just go to their forums and rub it in their face that they're losers. Or ignore them and tell people not to download it.

snkcube · Post by **snkcube** » Tue May 27, 2008 5:14 am

neo_bahamut1985 wrote:Someone should just go to their forums and rub it in their face that they're losers. Or ignore them and tell people not to download it.

The latter is much better.

Tallgeese · Post by **Tallgeese** » Tue May 27, 2008 5:58 am

It's oxymoronic though, but eh. In this case, no acknowledgement is best.

Notice how they gloated when they broke some protection.

Deathlike2 · Post by **Deathlike2** » Tue May 27, 2008 6:15 am

Metatron wrote:It's oxymoronic though, but eh. In this case, no acknowledgement is best.

You mean ironic? Oxymoronic has a different definition, see "icy hot".

Notice how they gloated when they broke some protection.

Well, it's simple that bug fixing can't be done on their end, so it's just a waste of time to edit the about screen a day late and a dollar short. The simple fact is if you aren't using your brain in realize the farce the other guys are doing, you might as well stay stupid.

Post by **grinvader** » Tue May 27, 2008 6:19 am

Deathlike2 wrote:
Metatron wrote:It's oxymoronic though, but eh. In this case, no acknowledgement is best.
You mean ironic? Oxymoronic has a different definition, see "icy hot".

*points to the 'moronic' part.

Post by **Nach** » Tue May 27, 2008 9:30 am

I just made some minor improvements to the MFC related stuff.

Mudlord, can you tell me if it compiles for you?
If it does compile, does it run, crash, or mysteriously exit?

mudlord · Post by **mudlord** » Tue May 27, 2008 10:12 am

Nope.

Doesn't compile here. Even after fixing your unprotect_buffer() stuff, still doesn't compile. Loads of errors though.

Tallgeese · Post by **Tallgeese** » Tue May 27, 2008 10:29 am

Deathlike2 wrote:
Metatron wrote:It's oxymoronic though, but eh. In this case, no acknowledgement is best.
You mean ironic? Oxymoronic has a different definition, see "icy hot".[

No, I meant oxymoronic.

How do you ignore someone, while at the same time telling people not to download from them? You're not really ignoring them if you give them some publicity, however negative.

I.S.T. · Post by **I.S.T.** » Tue May 27, 2008 10:52 am

I was wondering why people didn't get that...

franpa · Post by **franpa** » Tue May 27, 2008 12:31 pm

ngemu appears to be offline

I.S.T. · Post by **I.S.T.** » Tue May 27, 2008 12:39 pm

ngemu has that problem sometimes. Just reload, it will most likely work.

Rashidi · Post by **Rashidi** » Tue May 27, 2008 12:43 pm

franpa wrote:ngemu appears to be offline

i can access ngemu, on http://www.ngemu.com/gba the news itself was about VBA-M svn revision 515 (dated 21 May 2008)

franpa · Post by **franpa** » Tue May 27, 2008 1:05 pm

try clearing your cache.

Rashidi · Post by **Rashidi** » Tue May 27, 2008 3:19 pm

fyi, the last time i checked the ngemu before (especialy gba section), was way before the revision 515 was released

i'm also able to go to:
http://vba-m.ngemu.com/ and
http://vba-m.ngemu.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=103
from the the page displayed on http://www.ngemu.com/gba

unfortunately, when i go to the forum i got this messages:

The maximum server load limit has been reached. Please check back later once the server is less busy.

i quess thats sums up most of your ngemu problems

franpa · Post by **franpa** » Tue May 27, 2008 4:19 pm

Did you clear your cache?

Post by **Nach** » Tue May 27, 2008 4:32 pm

mudlord wrote:Nope.

Doesn't compile here. Even after fixing your unprotect_buffer() stuff, still doesn't compile. Loads of errors though.

Great

Catch me online, or if not, PM me the error list.

AamirM · Post by **AamirM** » Tue May 27, 2008 4:38 pm

Metatron wrote:No, I meant oxymoronic.

How do you ignore someone, while at the same time telling people not to download from them? You're not really ignoring them if you give them some publicity, however negative.

Hi,

I suggest requesting some main emu news websites to stop posting their releases and news about them.

Idiots like these caused the developers of my favourite emu of all time, NeoRAGEX, to stop developing it. I say something must be done against them.

stay safe,

AamirM