Which resolutions do you use/want to use?

General area for talk about ZSNES. The best place to ask for related questions as well as troubleshooting.

Moderator: ZSNES Mods

Which resolutions are you people using (or would like to use) ?

256x224 / 256x239 / 320x240 (lowres NTSC / PAL / 4:3)
2
3%
512x448 / 512x478 / 640x480 (hires NTSC / PAL / 4:3)
25
38%
768x672 / 768x717 / 960x720 (3x NTSC / PAL / 4:3)
8
12%
1024x896 / 1024x956 / 1280x960 (4x NTSC / PAL / 4:3)
4
6%
800x600 (stretched '2x' 4:3)
5
8%
1024x768 (stretched '3x' 4:3)
11
17%
1280x1024 (stretched '4x' 4:3)
7
11%
Others
4
6%
 
Total votes: 66

Aerdan
Winter Knight
Posts: 467
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 10:16 pm
Contact:

Which resolutions do you use/want to use?

Post by Aerdan »

[EDIT: On second thought, this needs to be a poll as to what resolutions people use.]

256x224
256x239
320x240
512x448
512x478
640x480
768x672
768x717
800x600
960x720
1024x768
1024x896
1024x956
1280x960
1280x1024
Other

[EDIT: Yes, I'm aware that some of these aren't actually in ZSNES right now, but the ones that aren't will be, and the modes that aren't listed will be removed unless someone can demonstrate that we *must* support them.]
Last edited by Aerdan on Mon Feb 07, 2005 12:01 am, edited 4 times in total.
Clements
Randomness
Posts: 1172
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2004 4:01 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by Clements »

No, since either my monitor and/or drivers does not seem to support such a low resolution. ZSNES crashes when I select 256x224 R Full.

Edit: Since this thread has changed a bit since I posted: I always use 1280x1024, 60Hz+vsync+HQ4x.
Last edited by Clements on Thu Feb 10, 2005 12:44 pm, edited 2 times in total.
grinvader
ZSNES Shake Shake Prinny
Posts: 5632
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2004 4:15 pm
Location: PAL50, dood !

Post by grinvader »

Old votes didn't get erased.
Those who voted, please post and tell which you'd vote for now.
皆黙って俺について来い!!

Code: Select all

<jmr> bsnes has the most accurate wiki page but it takes forever to load (or something)
Pantheon: Gideon Zhi | CaitSith2 | Nach | kode54
Oblivion
What?
Posts: 177
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2004 1:32 pm
Location: You'd want to know, wouldn't you?

Post by Oblivion »

I voted 512x448, since I always use that resoloution.
Everything I say is a lie.
Neo Kaiser
Veteran
Posts: 844
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2004 3:56 am

Post by Neo Kaiser »

800x600 DS just like my monitor.
Yes I know that my grammar sucks!
Nach
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer
Posts: 3904
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 10:54 pm
Location: Solar powered park bench
Contact:

Post by Nach »

If someone removes 800x600, they have a death wish.
May 9 2007 - NSRT 3.4, now with lots of hashing and even more accurate information! Go download it.
_____________
Insane Coding
Agozer
16-bit Corpse | Nyoron~
Posts: 3534
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Nokia Land

Post by Agozer »

1280x1024 DS just like my TFT.
whicker: franpa is grammatically correct, and he still gets ripped on?
sweener2001: Grammatically correct this one time? sure. every other time? no. does that give him a right? not really.
Image
Aerdan
Winter Knight
Posts: 467
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 10:16 pm
Contact:

Post by Aerdan »

Nach wrote:If someone removes 800x600, they have a death wish.
Why must we support 800x600?
Nach
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer
Posts: 3904
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 10:54 pm
Location: Solar powered park bench
Contact:

Post by Nach »

Vareni Stargazer wrote:
Nach wrote:If someone removes 800x600, they have a death wish.
Why must we support 800x600?
Because it's a standard res that works on machines with 15" monitors and stuff like I have lying around.
May 9 2007 - NSRT 3.4, now with lots of hashing and even more accurate information! Go download it.
_____________
Insane Coding
kevman
Redneck Gamer-Mod
Posts: 433
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 2:15 am
Location: Pittsburgh

Post by kevman »

I use both 640x480 (native res on my laptop. Yes, I know, really old), and 1024x768 on my good PC.
SHREIK!!!!!!! DDdddnnnnnnaaaa! GESTAHLLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!!!

Steelers now officially own your ass.
_Falcon_
New Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 12:23 pm
Location: Brasil SP

Post by _Falcon_ »

512x448 DR Win
this is the best one that my 4 megabyte video memory can handle
but i remember that a translation (i belive Secret of Rudras) don't look good with that resolution so for some time i used another resolution before i change back
AspiringSquire
Born to Rule... Impatiently
Posts: 265
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 8:21 pm
Location: Everywhere I want to be.
Contact:

Post by AspiringSquire »

I use ZSNES on two computers. For one I have to use 320x240, in the DOS version, to make it as fast as possible. Resolutions any lower than that aren't faster, because they aren't Vesa2. ModeQ doesn't work at all; it just makes it unviewable. ModeX, whatever that is, has to stay; ZSNES defaults to it when VESA2 doesn't work, such as under WinXP or on a PC that doesn't have MMX support (since the option is enabled in ZSNES by default).

By the way, could Vesa2 and/or ModeX support in 256x224 be added for DOS, since this is the SNES resolution (and because Vesa2 is fastest and ModeQ is incompatible for me)?

The other PC runs the Windows version at full speed, so I stick with 640x480 Full (stretched) to allow for video filters (I prefer Interpolation). I don't need any other resolution for full-screen, really, but my windowed resolution varies.
Vareni Stargazer wrote:[EDIT: On second thought, this needs to be a poll as to what resolutions people use.]
What about multiple PC users, like me? Someone needs to vouch for those low resolutions... Is that how I should vote?
[url=http://board.zsnes.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=3298][color=brown]My [u]NES palette[/u][/color][/url] - better colors with any emulator.

"the more you know, and the more you can do... the more you are."
- [url=http://www.danielbohman.com][color=brown][u]daniel bohman[/u][/color][/url]
Aerdan
Winter Knight
Posts: 467
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 10:16 pm
Contact:

Post by Aerdan »

I'd say "Vote for the lowest resolution you use", or vote for "Others" and state what you use in the thread.
Neo Kaiser
Veteran
Posts: 844
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2004 3:56 am

Post by Neo Kaiser »

Well I have a 17" Monitor but I use 800x600 because it looks better and fonts are at regular size. I wonder what resolution I would need for a Plasma TV.
Yes I know that my grammar sucks!
Sferics
Regular
Posts: 201
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 3:48 am
Contact:

Post by Sferics »

Even though my monitors res is 1280*1024, 640*480 DR has always been fastest for me.
David Dunham - "Efficiency is intelligent laziness"
Aerdan
Winter Knight
Posts: 467
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 10:16 pm
Contact:

Post by Aerdan »

AspiringSquire wrote:By the way, could Vesa2 and/or ModeX support in 256x224 be added for DOS, since this is the SNES resolution (and because Vesa2 is fastest and ModeQ is incompatible for me)?
Well, the way ZSNES gets its resolution has been unified into one file...finally, so it's possible that we can inflict VESA2 on 256x224.
JAPPsmash
Rookie
Posts: 34
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 3:31 pm

Post by JAPPsmash »

I used to play at 1024x768 DS FULL, but now at 640x480 DS FULL and Interpolation filter... It's enough for me.

640x480 DS FULL on my Pentium 4 2400 MHz
640x480 DR FULL on my Celeron 850 MHz
Butters
adventure_of_link
Locksmith of Hyrule
Posts: 3634
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 7:49 am
Location: 255.255.255.255
Contact:

Post by adventure_of_link »

On my Pentuim MMX boxes, I used to use the lowest setting I could. On my new box, I use 512x384. I don't really need anything too big, or too small, unless I have to.
<Nach> so why don't the two of you get your own room and leave us alone with this stupidity of yours?
NSRT here.
Cecil
Paladin
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2004 2:25 am

Post by Cecil »

I use 1024x768, same as my monitor.
System Specs:

2.2GHz Athlon64 X2 4400+, 2GB DDR 400 SDRAM
EVGA Geforce 7600GT 256MB
Realtek AC '97
Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium
Aerdan
Winter Knight
Posts: 467
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 10:16 pm
Contact:

Post by Aerdan »

People, people, people...

*PLEASE* vote in the poll unless you don't see an option for the mode you use....
Gil_Hamilton
Buzzkill Gil
Posts: 4294
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 7:14 pm

Post by Gil_Hamilton »

I'd like to see a 512*448 fullscreen mode, if it's possible.
Currently using 640*480 fullscreen.
Aerdan
Winter Knight
Posts: 467
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 10:16 pm
Contact:

Post by Aerdan »

Gil_Hamilton wrote:I'd like to see a 512*448 fullscreen mode, if it's possible.
We are divorcing windowed/fullscreen from the video modes thing. *sigh*
JAPPsmash
Rookie
Posts: 34
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 3:31 pm

Post by JAPPsmash »

What I'd like to see is 320x240 and Small Screen
blackmyst
Zealot
Posts: 1161
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 8:36 pm
Location: Place.

Post by blackmyst »

640x480 stretched fullscreen (or at least horizontally)

Because that's the only resolution that properly supports scanlines (my hardware doesn't allow 1280x960).
[size=75][b]Procrastination.[/b]
Hard Work Often Pays Off After Time, but Laziness Always Pays Off Now.[/size]
crocomire
Hazed
Posts: 70
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 6:27 am
Location: Brazil
Contact:

Post by crocomire »

512x448 DR Win + Super 2xSAI Engine :wink:
THE LAST METROID IS IN CAPTIVITY.
THE GALAXY IS AT PEACE...
Post Reply