Buying New Comp Parts...

Place to talk about all that new hardware and decaying software you have.

Moderator: General Mods

funkyass
"God"
Posts: 1128
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 11:24 pm

Post by funkyass »

Unless you are using a SSD, then you won't notice it. If you are using an SSD, then NCQ is moot anyways.

I think most of the AHCI drivers where started after XP support ended - hence the reason for the inconsistent support for it.

As for hotplgu - my sata drives are hot pluggable on my nf4 board, under XP, but not my newer AMD board.
Last edited by funkyass on Tue Dec 22, 2009 11:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Does [Kevin] Smith masturbate with steel wool too?

- Yes, but don’t change the subject.
Deathlike2
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer
Posts: 6747
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am

Post by Deathlike2 »

Ah, ok thanks. Figured SSDs would require that kind of insane bandwidth. Most of the bandwidth for non-SSDs is used by the cache for burst rate IIRC.
Continuing [url=http://slickproductions.org/forum/index.php?board=13.0]FF4[/url] Research...
funkyass
"God"
Posts: 1128
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 11:24 pm

Post by funkyass »

One thing about IDE emulation vs AHCI, on my board at least, is that I am limited to 4 drives using IDE emulation.
Does [Kevin] Smith masturbate with steel wool too?

- Yes, but don’t change the subject.
Deathlike2
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer
Posts: 6747
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am

Post by Deathlike2 »

I assume you have a SATA controller with 6 ports (and a secondary controller with PATA+SATA on it)... that's probably more of an issue to your board though.
Continuing [url=http://slickproductions.org/forum/index.php?board=13.0]FF4[/url] Research...
odditude
Official tech support dood
Posts: 2118
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 7:57 am

Post by odditude »

IDE emulation, by definition, would limit you to four drives: pm, ps, sm, ss. allowing more devices would require emulating multiple IDE controllers.
Why yes, my shift key *IS* broken.
Deathlike2
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer
Posts: 6747
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am

Post by Deathlike2 »

Well, you technically need as many IDE controllers as you have pairs of disks. My BIOS lists the 5th and 6th ports as Third Master and Fourth Master... instead of Third-Primary+Slave...
Continuing [url=http://slickproductions.org/forum/index.php?board=13.0]FF4[/url] Research...
Gil_Hamilton
Buzzkill Gil
Posts: 4294
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 7:14 pm

Post by Gil_Hamilton »

Yeah. There's nothing that prevents you from having more than two IDE channels. It's just that four devices is all most consumers need, so only two channels are built into most motherboard chipsets.
Squall_Leonhart wrote:
You have your 2s, 4s, 8s, 16s, 32s, 64s, and 128s(crash course in binary counting!). But no 1s.
DirectInput represents all bits, not just powers of 2 in an axis.
KHDownloads
Rashidi
Trooper
Posts: 515
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 2:45 pm

Post by Rashidi »

i really miss the old days when {ISA} sound card come with an extra built-in IDE controler.
kode54
Zealot
Posts: 1140
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2004 3:31 am
Contact:

Post by kode54 »

Oh damn, just imagine how slow that is compared to a proper PCI controller. Most of those sound card integrated solutions only supported PIO mode, too.

It's like buying integrated video support.
Deathlike2
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer
Posts: 6747
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am

Post by Deathlike2 »

Whoa Nellie!

I remember a friend buying the Creative AWE32+CDROM pack... it was nice for the most part.
Continuing [url=http://slickproductions.org/forum/index.php?board=13.0]FF4[/url] Research...
Gil_Hamilton
Buzzkill Gil
Posts: 4294
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 7:14 pm

Post by Gil_Hamilton »

Rashidi wrote:i really miss the old days when {ISA} sound card come with an extra built-in IDE controler.
Ah yeah, the CD-ROM upgrade kits.

I think most of those were only partially-functional controllers. But I never had one, so I'm not sure.



Nowadays you can grab a PCI card with two IDE channels on it for cheap, though. Heck, even a basic RAID controller's not too expensive.
Squall_Leonhart wrote:
You have your 2s, 4s, 8s, 16s, 32s, 64s, and 128s(crash course in binary counting!). But no 1s.
DirectInput represents all bits, not just powers of 2 in an axis.
KHDownloads
Deathlike2
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer
Posts: 6747
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am

Post by Deathlike2 »

I don't think my friend tried to connect a HD to that IDE controller, but it was probably necessary to avoid using existing IDE controllers to prevent the CDROM from being installed... you couldn't really anticipate the massive configurations that was available out there when ISA was prominent.
Continuing [url=http://slickproductions.org/forum/index.php?board=13.0]FF4[/url] Research...
odditude
Official tech support dood
Posts: 2118
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 7:57 am

Post by odditude »

i miss the old vlb everything-on-one-card cards... a single card had 2 serial, 1 parallel, 1 gameport, 2 IDE, 1 floppy, and made those awe32+ide cards look short :D
Why yes, my shift key *IS* broken.
Deathlike2
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer
Posts: 6747
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am

Post by Deathlike2 »

Those tend to occupy another bracket, which kinda annoyed me. :P
Continuing [url=http://slickproductions.org/forum/index.php?board=13.0]FF4[/url] Research...
odditude
Official tech support dood
Posts: 2118
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 7:57 am

Post by odditude »

Deathlike2 wrote:Those tend to occupy another bracket, which kinda annoyed me. :P
that just means you didn't have an awesome case with punchouts for the extra ports ;)
Why yes, my shift key *IS* broken.
Gil_Hamilton
Buzzkill Gil
Posts: 4294
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 7:14 pm

Post by Gil_Hamilton »

odditude wrote:i miss the old vlb everything-on-one-card cards... a single card had 2 serial, 1 parallel, 1 gameport, 2 IDE, 1 floppy, and made those awe32+ide cards look short :D
Yeah... and then they either refused to sit right and crashed the system, or they crashed it because VESA Local Bus was a terrible standard and fucked the signal timings up horrifically.
Squall_Leonhart wrote:
You have your 2s, 4s, 8s, 16s, 32s, 64s, and 128s(crash course in binary counting!). But no 1s.
DirectInput represents all bits, not just powers of 2 in an axis.
KHDownloads
Deathlike2
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer
Posts: 6747
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am

Post by Deathlike2 »

The extra long clusterfuck of a video card or just any card on that bus is asking for a disaster.
Continuing [url=http://slickproductions.org/forum/index.php?board=13.0]FF4[/url] Research...
Gil_Hamilton
Buzzkill Gil
Posts: 4294
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 7:14 pm

Post by Gil_Hamilton »

Deathlike2 wrote:The extra long clusterfuck of a video card or just any card on that bus is asking for a disaster.
Just from mechanical issues!

Even ignoring the fact that VLB was just dragging 486 address lines out and that caused timing errors right off the bat if you had too many cards in.

Or that changing CPUs could change your bus clock rate, and a lot of cards couldn't handle >33MHz clocks.


God, every time I'm reminded of VLB I cringe at how kludgy it was.
Squall_Leonhart wrote:
You have your 2s, 4s, 8s, 16s, 32s, 64s, and 128s(crash course in binary counting!). But no 1s.
DirectInput represents all bits, not just powers of 2 in an axis.
KHDownloads
Deathlike2
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer
Posts: 6747
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am

Re: Buying New Comp Parts...

Post by Deathlike2 »

Small bump

I've reinstalled XP recently while using the Intel RST 10.x series drives (not officially released, but are WHQL certified) AND fortunately it isn't causing any BSODs!

I set my system up for RAID mode on the Intel ICH10R controller, and have found that the RAID drivers tend to be less BSOD sensitive (through experimentation) than the AHCI drivers on XP. I have no idea why that is the case, but I hope that's useful to someone.

Although, between that time and now, I did get a BIOS update that updated Intel's RAID/ACHI BIOS to 1.20e, which is supposed to have faster detection for quicker booting. The annoying thing is that the addition JMicron controllers suck ass (I have to use it for the IDE portion, because I still have PATA HDs) because it's AHCI/RAID mode adds like 3+ XP "revolutions" (that moving line) to my boot time. Very annoying crap.
Continuing [url=http://slickproductions.org/forum/index.php?board=13.0]FF4[/url] Research...
kode54
Zealot
Posts: 1140
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2004 3:31 am
Contact:

Re: Buying New Comp Parts...

Post by kode54 »

Very interesting. Considering my dad and I both have desktop motherboards with ICH10R and JMicron controllers. I have no trouble with AHCI, but then, I'm also running Windows 7, while he's still running Windows XP.

For him, setting up the AHCI drivers and enabling AHCI mode will hopefully fix an annoying issue he had with his optical drive randomly deciding to disappear completely from the device manager after working perfectly for over a month at a time. It usually solved itself by powering the system down for a while and then rebooting it.

And yes, he has to use the JMicron controller for PATA because he still has an older drive installed. Also, I don't think he's ever experienced a BSOD related to the hard drive controllers. Or anything else, for that matter.
Deathlike2
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer
Posts: 6747
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am

Re: Buying New Comp Parts...

Post by Deathlike2 »

kode54 wrote:Very interesting. Considering my dad and I both have desktop motherboards with ICH10R and JMicron controllers. I have no trouble with AHCI, but then, I'm also running Windows 7, while he's still running Windows XP.

For him, setting up the AHCI drivers and enabling AHCI mode will hopefully fix an annoying issue he had with his optical drive randomly deciding to disappear completely from the device manager after working perfectly for over a month at a time. It usually solved itself by powering the system down for a while and then rebooting it.
I've never had that happen, but that is strange. Sounds more like an issue with the drive... but the JMicron controller is primarily "ideal" for eSATA they are supposed to be used for... I had my optical drive originally in the JMicron port (now on the Intel port, because there's supposed to be some sort of power saving feature for optical drives in the newest drivers) and the most annoying attribute was that it was ALWAYS considered hot pluggable... even with a hard drive that was temporarily put in there. I used the drivers that is supposed to "detect" which mode it is in, but the damn drivers/hardware is clearly fail IMO. Only "plus" was that having a SATA hard drive plugged in reduced boot time, but that really seems like a bug or bad behavior to me.
And yes, he has to use the JMicron controller for PATA because he still has an older drive installed. Also, I don't think he's ever experienced a BSOD related to the hard drive controllers. Or anything else, for that matter.
I've had a BSOD, but my primary boot drive was a PATA hard drive at the time and wanted to switch from ACHI/RAID to IDE... the JMicron controller was PATA+2SATA port deal, and I thought it would be OK, but apparently not. Anyways, booting to the SATA drive on the Intel controller definately helped boot speed. Don't expect anything good with the JMicron poop.
Continuing [url=http://slickproductions.org/forum/index.php?board=13.0]FF4[/url] Research...
Post Reply