Popups on IE - even at blank pages
Moderator: General Mods
Popups on IE - even at blank pages
I've run scans using Ad-Aware , Spybot , and Bitdefender and I deleted stuff I found manually , but I keep getting popups when I use IE , my homepage is blank , and I even get popups then
every popup window says "Advertisement by outerinfo"
Anyone know a fix for this (other than firefox which I already have)
every popup window says "Advertisement by outerinfo"
Anyone know a fix for this (other than firefox which I already have)
[img]http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y180/ReRuss/UBAR.gif[/img]
360 and PS3 - ReRuss
360 and PS3 - ReRuss
-
- ZSNES Developer
- Posts: 6747
- Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 4:50 am
- Location: Georgia
- Contact:
http://www.tomcoyote.org/hijackthis/
Quitting on IE altogether is just dumb. There are too many sites that will not work with Firefox.
Quitting on IE altogether is just dumb. There are too many sites that will not work with Firefox.
-
- ZSNES Developer
- Posts: 6747
- Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am
If you said Opera, I wouldn't have looked at this twice, but that is grossly inaccurate.Annihilated wrote:http://www.tomcoyote.org/hijackthis/
Quitting on IE altogether is just dumb. There are too many sites that will not work with Firefox.
Continuing [url=http://slickproductions.org/forum/index.php?board=13.0]FF4[/url] Research...
-
- Hero of Time
- Posts: 2646
- Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2004 2:49 am
- Location: In front of the monitor
- Contact:
Re: Popups on IE - even at blank pages
Try scanning in safe mode.ReRuss wrote:I've run scans using Ad-Aware , Spybot , and Bitdefender and I deleted stuff I found manually , but I keep getting popups when I use IE , my homepage is blank , and I even get popups then
every popup window says "Advertisement by outerinfo"
Anyone know a fix for this (other than firefox which I already have)
taking the information you gave us and redirecting it into google gets you this:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Ad ... gle+Search
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Ad ... gle+Search
[url=http://www.alexchiu.com/affiliates/clickthru.cgi?id=phonymike]ultimate immortality[/url]
[url=http://www.sloganizer.net/en/][img]http://www.sloganizer.net/en/image,zsnes,white,purple.png[/img][/url]
[url=http://www.sloganizer.net/en/][img]http://www.sloganizer.net/en/image,zsnes,white,purple.png[/img][/url]
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 4:50 am
- Location: Georgia
- Contact:
-
- ZSNES Developer
- Posts: 6747
- Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am
Let me be clear. If you complained about Opera and site compatibility, I wouldn't take too much issue. Firefox is very good on website compatibility. The fact is that sites that are not compatible are simply not written to standards and/or include ActiveX.Annihilated wrote:What does Opera have to do with anything?
When spyware is mentioned, it is a symptom of using IE 99% of the time.
Last edited by Deathlike2 on Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Continuing [url=http://slickproductions.org/forum/index.php?board=13.0]FF4[/url] Research...
That's supposed to be their problem, not mine, right?Annihilated wrote:http://www.tomcoyote.org/hijackthis/
Quitting on IE altogether is just dumb. There are too many sites that will not work with Firefox.
I don't really remember the last time I was forced to use IE for a website anyway.
[size=75][b]Procrastination.[/b]
Hard Work Often Pays Off After Time, but Laziness Always Pays Off Now.[/size]
Hard Work Often Pays Off After Time, but Laziness Always Pays Off Now.[/size]
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 4:50 am
- Location: Georgia
- Contact:
You're probably talking about Internet Explorer 6, and the reason it's so wide open to spyware is because Microsoft took about 5 years off before they finally upgraded it again. I have Windows 2000 so I can't get IE7, but it's supposed to be a lot better.Deathlike2 wrote:Let me be clear. If you complained about Opera and site compatibility, I wouldn't take too much issue. Firefox is very good on website compatibility. The fact is that sites that are not compatible are simply not written to standards and/or include ActiveX.Annihilated wrote:What does Opera have to do with anything?
When spyware is mentioned, it is a symptom of using IE 99% of the time.
If you're the one who can't view a website correctly because you refuse to use the standard browser, that sounds like a problem for you.That's supposed to be their problem, not mine, right?
As Firefox becomes more popular it becomes less secure. I used to never see a pop-up in Firefox and now I'm fighting them off frequently. It isn't really the browser's fault. Besides, if you use precautions and common sense, you shouldn't have much of a problem with spyware. HijackThis should solve the original problem in this thread. Just make sure you aren't removing EVERYTHING and only remove what you know doesn't belong there.
-
- ZSNES Developer
- Posts: 6747
- Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am
That is WRONG. As Firefox becomes more popular, people are looking to find security holes, just like anything with popularity. Popularity does not imply poor security.Annihilated wrote:As Firefox becomes more popular it becomes less secure.
Continuing [url=http://slickproductions.org/forum/index.php?board=13.0]FF4[/url] Research...
-
- Inmate
- Posts: 1751
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 7:47 am
- Location: WA
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 4:50 am
- Location: Georgia
- Contact:
Finding security holes means more ads and spyware. Therefore it is less secure. So it isn't wrong, you're really just agreeing with what I said.Deathlike2 wrote:That is WRONG. As Firefox becomes more popular, people are looking to find security holes, just like anything with popularity. Popularity does not imply poor security.Annihilated wrote:As Firefox becomes more popular it becomes less secure.
-
- ZSNES Developer
- Posts: 6747
- Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am
Apparently you are clueless. You fail at logic.Annihilated wrote:Finding security holes means more ads and spyware. Therefore it is less secure. So it isn't wrong, you're really just agreeing with what I said.Deathlike2 wrote:That is WRONG. As Firefox becomes more popular, people are looking to find security holes, just like anything with popularity. Popularity does not imply poor security.Annihilated wrote:As Firefox becomes more popular it becomes less secure.
Again, popularity or lack of popularity does not imply security. Good or bad security does not imply popularity.
Continuing [url=http://slickproductions.org/forum/index.php?board=13.0]FF4[/url] Research...
IETAB does not require IE, it is just the browser chosen by default when you install IETAB.whicker wrote:franpa wrote:and for the sites that REQUIRE IE, you can simply use IETAB
IETab embeds an instance of Internet Explorer. Hence, it brings with it the same issues as Internet Explorer.
and if your smart and know if the site your visiting will screw your pc up in IE then use mozilla FF, and dont set IETAB up for that website.
Core i7 920 @ 2.66GHZ | ASUS P6T Motherboard | 8GB DDR3 1600 RAM | Gigabyte Geforce 760 4GB | Windows 10 Pro x64
-
- Dark Wind
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2004 8:58 pm
- Location: Texas
- Contact:
Filterset.G is behind the times, man.sweener2001 wrote:how do you have pop-ups in firefox? i still don't have any.
adblock plus + filtersetg == smooth internets
and seconding hijackthis!
http://easylist.adblockplus.org/
You must have a pretty big ass to be able to pull so much out of it.franpa wrote:IETAB does not require IE
[u][url=http://bash.org/?577451]#577451[/url][/u]
You must have a pretty big ass to be able to pull so much out of it.[/quote]franpa wrote:IETAB does not require IE
if it only supports IE then why does IETAB let you specify location manually and set parameters? theres bound to be a reg key specifying the location of the browser that has not changed in any versions since v6 sp1, thus they could have it always refer to that regkey for the location of the external program and remove path to external browser.
Core i7 920 @ 2.66GHZ | ASUS P6T Motherboard | 8GB DDR3 1600 RAM | Gigabyte Geforce 760 4GB | Windows 10 Pro x64
-
- ZSNES Developer
- Posts: 6747
- Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am
http://ietab.mozdev.org/
I need not say more.Requirement: Microsoft Windows + Internet Explorer > 4.0
Continuing [url=http://slickproductions.org/forum/index.php?board=13.0]FF4[/url] Research...
-
- Inmate
- Posts: 1751
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 7:47 am
- Location: WA
i also subscribe to that list, as it's an option within the plug-in. so i'm subscribed to two lists, and it may be redundant, but whatever.Noxious Ninja wrote:Filterset.G is behind the times, man.sweener2001 wrote:how do you have pop-ups in firefox? i still don't have any.
adblock plus + filtersetg == smooth internets
and seconding hijackthis!
[img]http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c128/sweener2001/StewieSIGPIC.png[/img]
-
- Dark Wind
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2004 8:58 pm
- Location: Texas
- Contact:
I have yet to see a single pop up in Firefox with Adblock Plus, and if I ever see one, said extension has no problem blocking the pop up for good with some clever filter rules.
There isn't much use for FilterSet.G if you use Adblock Plus. It might be a different story with the regular Adblock however.
There isn't much use for FilterSet.G if you use Adblock Plus. It might be a different story with the regular Adblock however.
-
- ZSNES Developer
- Posts: 6747
- Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am
-
- Regular
- Posts: 203
- Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 8:40 pm
- Location: house of the rising sun
- Contact:
Depending on the country you are talking about, FireFox propagation is sometimes higher than 50% - making it the majority browser, not IE. Worldwide, its share continues to grow for very good reasons.
The truth is, Analhiated, the majority of the sites on the Internet do not require IE. It is not a "standard" browser by any stretch of the word. Ditching IE is a very feasible option, moreso than it ever has been before - and that isn't just because of Firefox.
The truth is, Analhiated, the majority of the sites on the Internet do not require IE. It is not a "standard" browser by any stretch of the word. Ditching IE is a very feasible option, moreso than it ever has been before - and that isn't just because of Firefox.
[url=http://whattheboat.com]whattheboat.com : [b]still not dead[/b][/url]
[url=http://playithardcore.com]playithardcore.com: we are better at games than you[/url]
Join boat web IRC and talk to boaters: [url]http://irc.whatthebert.com/[/url]
[url=http://playithardcore.com]playithardcore.com: we are better at games than you[/url]
Join boat web IRC and talk to boaters: [url]http://irc.whatthebert.com/[/url]