Popups on IE - even at blank pages

Place to talk about all that new hardware and decaying software you have.

Moderator: General Mods

ReRuss
Trooper
Posts: 443
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 9:49 pm
Location: Somewhere
Contact:

Popups on IE - even at blank pages

Post by ReRuss »

I've run scans using Ad-Aware , Spybot , and Bitdefender and I deleted stuff I found manually , but I keep getting popups when I use IE , my homepage is blank , and I even get popups then

every popup window says "Advertisement by outerinfo"

Anyone know a fix for this (other than firefox which I already have)
[img]http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y180/ReRuss/UBAR.gif[/img]
360 and PS3 - ReRuss
Deathlike2
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer
Posts: 6747
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am

Post by Deathlike2 »

Stop using IE altogether?

Seriously, you are asking for trouble.
Continuing [url=http://slickproductions.org/forum/index.php?board=13.0]FF4[/url] Research...
Annihilated
Rookie
Posts: 47
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 4:50 am
Location: Georgia
Contact:

Post by Annihilated »

http://www.tomcoyote.org/hijackthis/

Quitting on IE altogether is just dumb. There are too many sites that will not work with Firefox.
Deathlike2
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer
Posts: 6747
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am

Post by Deathlike2 »

Annihilated wrote:http://www.tomcoyote.org/hijackthis/

Quitting on IE altogether is just dumb. There are too many sites that will not work with Firefox.
If you said Opera, I wouldn't have looked at this twice, but that is grossly inaccurate.
Continuing [url=http://slickproductions.org/forum/index.php?board=13.0]FF4[/url] Research...
snkcube
Hero of Time
Posts: 2646
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2004 2:49 am
Location: In front of the monitor
Contact:

Re: Popups on IE - even at blank pages

Post by snkcube »

ReRuss wrote:I've run scans using Ad-Aware , Spybot , and Bitdefender and I deleted stuff I found manually , but I keep getting popups when I use IE , my homepage is blank , and I even get popups then

every popup window says "Advertisement by outerinfo"

Anyone know a fix for this (other than firefox which I already have)
Try scanning in safe mode.
Try out CCleaner and other free software at Piriform
Image
PHoNyMiKe
Retrosexual
Posts: 1011
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2004 2:09 am
Location: Rapture

Post by PHoNyMiKe »

taking the information you gave us and redirecting it into google gets you this:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Ad ... gle+Search
[url=http://www.alexchiu.com/affiliates/clickthru.cgi?id=phonymike]ultimate immortality[/url]
[url=http://www.sloganizer.net/en/][img]http://www.sloganizer.net/en/image,zsnes,white,purple.png[/img][/url]
Annihilated
Rookie
Posts: 47
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 4:50 am
Location: Georgia
Contact:

Post by Annihilated »

What does Opera have to do with anything?
Deathlike2
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer
Posts: 6747
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am

Post by Deathlike2 »

Annihilated wrote:What does Opera have to do with anything?
Let me be clear. If you complained about Opera and site compatibility, I wouldn't take too much issue. Firefox is very good on website compatibility. The fact is that sites that are not compatible are simply not written to standards and/or include ActiveX.

When spyware is mentioned, it is a symptom of using IE 99% of the time.
Last edited by Deathlike2 on Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Continuing [url=http://slickproductions.org/forum/index.php?board=13.0]FF4[/url] Research...
blackmyst
Zealot
Posts: 1161
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 8:36 pm
Location: Place.

Post by blackmyst »

Annihilated wrote:http://www.tomcoyote.org/hijackthis/

Quitting on IE altogether is just dumb. There are too many sites that will not work with Firefox.
That's supposed to be their problem, not mine, right?

I don't really remember the last time I was forced to use IE for a website anyway.
[size=75][b]Procrastination.[/b]
Hard Work Often Pays Off After Time, but Laziness Always Pays Off Now.[/size]
franpa
Gecko snack
Posts: 2374
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 11:06 am
Location: Australia, QLD
Contact:

Post by franpa »

and for the sites that REQUIRE IE, you can simply use IETAB :)
Core i7 920 @ 2.66GHZ | ASUS P6T Motherboard | 8GB DDR3 1600 RAM | Gigabyte Geforce 760 4GB | Windows 10 Pro x64
whicker
Trooper
Posts: 479
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 4:33 am

Post by whicker »

franpa wrote:and for the sites that REQUIRE IE, you can simply use IETAB :)
Image

IETab embeds an instance of Internet Explorer. Hence, it brings with it the same issues as Internet Explorer.
Annihilated
Rookie
Posts: 47
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 4:50 am
Location: Georgia
Contact:

Post by Annihilated »

Deathlike2 wrote:
Annihilated wrote:What does Opera have to do with anything?
Let me be clear. If you complained about Opera and site compatibility, I wouldn't take too much issue. Firefox is very good on website compatibility. The fact is that sites that are not compatible are simply not written to standards and/or include ActiveX.

When spyware is mentioned, it is a symptom of using IE 99% of the time.
You're probably talking about Internet Explorer 6, and the reason it's so wide open to spyware is because Microsoft took about 5 years off before they finally upgraded it again. I have Windows 2000 so I can't get IE7, but it's supposed to be a lot better.
That's supposed to be their problem, not mine, right?
If you're the one who can't view a website correctly because you refuse to use the standard browser, that sounds like a problem for you.

As Firefox becomes more popular it becomes less secure. I used to never see a pop-up in Firefox and now I'm fighting them off frequently. It isn't really the browser's fault. Besides, if you use precautions and common sense, you shouldn't have much of a problem with spyware. HijackThis should solve the original problem in this thread. Just make sure you aren't removing EVERYTHING and only remove what you know doesn't belong there.
Deathlike2
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer
Posts: 6747
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am

Post by Deathlike2 »

Annihilated wrote:As Firefox becomes more popular it becomes less secure.
That is WRONG. As Firefox becomes more popular, people are looking to find security holes, just like anything with popularity. Popularity does not imply poor security.
Continuing [url=http://slickproductions.org/forum/index.php?board=13.0]FF4[/url] Research...
sweener2001
Inmate
Posts: 1751
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 7:47 am
Location: WA

Post by sweener2001 »

how do you have pop-ups in firefox? i still don't have any.

adblock plus + filtersetg == smooth internets

and seconding hijackthis!
[img]http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c128/sweener2001/StewieSIGPIC.png[/img]
Annihilated
Rookie
Posts: 47
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 4:50 am
Location: Georgia
Contact:

Post by Annihilated »

Deathlike2 wrote:
Annihilated wrote:As Firefox becomes more popular it becomes less secure.
That is WRONG. As Firefox becomes more popular, people are looking to find security holes, just like anything with popularity. Popularity does not imply poor security.
Finding security holes means more ads and spyware. Therefore it is less secure. So it isn't wrong, you're really just agreeing with what I said.
Deathlike2
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer
Posts: 6747
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am

Post by Deathlike2 »

Annihilated wrote:
Deathlike2 wrote:
Annihilated wrote:As Firefox becomes more popular it becomes less secure.
That is WRONG. As Firefox becomes more popular, people are looking to find security holes, just like anything with popularity. Popularity does not imply poor security.
Finding security holes means more ads and spyware. Therefore it is less secure. So it isn't wrong, you're really just agreeing with what I said.
Apparently you are clueless. You fail at logic.

Again, popularity or lack of popularity does not imply security. Good or bad security does not imply popularity.
Continuing [url=http://slickproductions.org/forum/index.php?board=13.0]FF4[/url] Research...
franpa
Gecko snack
Posts: 2374
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 11:06 am
Location: Australia, QLD
Contact:

Post by franpa »

whicker wrote:
franpa wrote:and for the sites that REQUIRE IE, you can simply use IETAB :)
Image

IETab embeds an instance of Internet Explorer. Hence, it brings with it the same issues as Internet Explorer.
IETAB does not require IE, it is just the browser chosen by default when you install IETAB.

and if your smart and know if the site your visiting will screw your pc up in IE then use mozilla FF, and dont set IETAB up for that website.
Core i7 920 @ 2.66GHZ | ASUS P6T Motherboard | 8GB DDR3 1600 RAM | Gigabyte Geforce 760 4GB | Windows 10 Pro x64
Noxious Ninja
Dark Wind
Posts: 1271
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2004 8:58 pm
Location: Texas
Contact:

Post by Noxious Ninja »

sweener2001 wrote:how do you have pop-ups in firefox? i still don't have any.

adblock plus + filtersetg == smooth internets

and seconding hijackthis!
Filterset.G is behind the times, man.

http://easylist.adblockplus.org/

franpa wrote:IETAB does not require IE
You must have a pretty big ass to be able to pull so much out of it.
[u][url=http://bash.org/?577451]#577451[/url][/u]
franpa
Gecko snack
Posts: 2374
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 11:06 am
Location: Australia, QLD
Contact:

Post by franpa »

franpa wrote:IETAB does not require IE
You must have a pretty big ass to be able to pull so much out of it.[/quote]
if it only supports IE then why does IETAB let you specify location manually and set parameters? theres bound to be a reg key specifying the location of the browser that has not changed in any versions since v6 sp1, thus they could have it always refer to that regkey for the location of the external program and remove path to external browser.
Core i7 920 @ 2.66GHZ | ASUS P6T Motherboard | 8GB DDR3 1600 RAM | Gigabyte Geforce 760 4GB | Windows 10 Pro x64
Deathlike2
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer
Posts: 6747
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am

Post by Deathlike2 »

http://ietab.mozdev.org/
Requirement: Microsoft Windows + Internet Explorer > 4.0
I need not say more.
Continuing [url=http://slickproductions.org/forum/index.php?board=13.0]FF4[/url] Research...
sweener2001
Inmate
Posts: 1751
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 7:47 am
Location: WA

Post by sweener2001 »

Noxious Ninja wrote:
sweener2001 wrote:how do you have pop-ups in firefox? i still don't have any.

adblock plus + filtersetg == smooth internets

and seconding hijackthis!
Filterset.G is behind the times, man.
i also subscribe to that list, as it's an option within the plug-in. so i'm subscribed to two lists, and it may be redundant, but whatever.
[img]http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c128/sweener2001/StewieSIGPIC.png[/img]
Noxious Ninja
Dark Wind
Posts: 1271
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2004 8:58 pm
Location: Texas
Contact:

Post by Noxious Ninja »

franpa wrote:if it only supports IE then why does IETAB let you specify location manually and set parameters?
That controls the "Open Link in Ext. App" context menu option. It can be quite useful to be easily open the page in, say, Opera.
[u][url=http://bash.org/?577451]#577451[/url][/u]
Agozer
16-bit Corpse | Nyoron~
Posts: 3534
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Nokia Land

Post by Agozer »

I have yet to see a single pop up in Firefox with Adblock Plus, and if I ever see one, said extension has no problem blocking the pop up for good with some clever filter rules.

There isn't much use for FilterSet.G if you use Adblock Plus. It might be a different story with the regular Adblock however.
whicker: franpa is grammatically correct, and he still gets ripped on?
sweener2001: Grammatically correct this one time? sure. every other time? no. does that give him a right? not really.
Image
Deathlike2
ZSNES Developer
ZSNES Developer
Posts: 6747
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:47 am

Post by Deathlike2 »

Opera's been fine to me in dealing with popups... I don't recall popups succeeding in Opera at all now that I think about it (if any, it was rare).
Continuing [url=http://slickproductions.org/forum/index.php?board=13.0]FF4[/url] Research...
soulmata
Regular
Posts: 203
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: house of the rising sun
Contact:

Post by soulmata »

Depending on the country you are talking about, FireFox propagation is sometimes higher than 50% - making it the majority browser, not IE. Worldwide, its share continues to grow for very good reasons.

The truth is, Analhiated, the majority of the sites on the Internet do not require IE. It is not a "standard" browser by any stretch of the word. Ditching IE is a very feasible option, moreso than it ever has been before - and that isn't just because of Firefox.
[url=http://whattheboat.com]whattheboat.com : [b]still not dead[/b][/url]
[url=http://playithardcore.com]playithardcore.com: we are better at games than you[/url]

Join boat web IRC and talk to boaters: [url]http://irc.whatthebert.com/[/url]
Post Reply